ArticleAustralian occupational therapy journal2026
Supporting implementation of occupational therapy led Falls Hazard Reduction at Home: A scoping review.
Article in Australian occupational therapy journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring successful implementation of occupational therapy led home fall-hazard reduction interventions.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2026Article
- Supporting implementation of occupational therapy led Falls Hazard Reduction at Home: A scoping review.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAccidental falls among older people pose a significant threat to both morbidity and mortality. Falls Hazard Reduction at Home (FHR@Home) when delivered by occupational therapists has been demonstrated as an effective fall prevention intervention. Despite the evidence, FHR@Home is not routinely implemented in practice. This scoping review seeks to explore existing literature to support implementation of FHR@Home by answering the question: 'What is known about implementation strategies used to support home and community environmental falls prevention intervention in health care?'
methodsThis review used the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. A comprehensive search was conducted across electronic databases, government websites, and web-based search engines. Studies were included if they incorporated FHR@Home as part of their intervention and explicitly referenced implementation science or knowledge translation concepts. Data were extracted from the included studies and reported implementation strategies were mapped using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) taxonomy and their associated clusters. A separate thematic analysis process was also conducted. CONSUMER AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: There was no consumer and community involvement.
resultsNineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. All ERIC implementation strategy clusters are reported on in the studies. Strategies relating to engagement and education of stakeholders appear more often in the literature. Three themes were identified as having influence on implementation outcomes: (1) Home as a practice context; (2) Collaboration is key to success; and (3) Balance of assumed knowledge, experience and fidelity.
conclusionThe findings underscore the need for further research to explore how implementation strategies can better support occupational therapists in delivering FHR@Home, particularly in ways that respect the consumer's sense of home while maintaining fidelity to evidence-based protocols. Expanding the literature in this area will be beneficial to improve uptake and sustainability of FHR@Home practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.