Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41588684›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of health psychology2026

The impact of how physicians self-present: A study of gender and attire effects on perceived warmth and competence.

Hannah Meltser, David M Markowitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of health psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hannah MeltserDepartment of Communication, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
David M MarkowitzDepartment of Communication, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7159-7014

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aimed to replicate the idea that physicians' self-presentation characteristics (i.e. formal vs. informal attire) and gender (i.e. men vs. women) influence perceptions of their warmth and competence. Further, we aimed to extend this line of work by examining how these relationships are moderated by trust in physicians.

designWe conducted a 2 (physician gender: men vs. women) × 2 (self-presentation: formal vs. informal attire) experiment using publicly available physician images.

methodsStudents (N = 734) were randomly assigned to rate five physician images from a pool of 20 stimuli across physician gender and attire conditions. Participants rated physicians on warmth and competence, and then completed a trust in physicians scale. Linear mixed models evaluated main effects and interaction effects for self-presentation, gender and physician trust.

resultsPhysicians in formal attire (white lab coats) were perceived as warmer and more competent than those in informal attire (casual or informal wear). Women physicians were rated as warmer, but not more competent than men physicians. Two-way interaction effects revealed formal attire enhanced perceptions of men physicians more than women on average. Three-way interaction effects indicated trust in physicians moderated these results, with women physicians' ratings being more dependent on participants' general trust levels, particularly for those with lower trust in the medical profession.

conclusionsWe replicated and extended this literature by demonstrating how physician gender and patient trust levels moderate self-presentation effects. For physicians, understanding a patient's relationship with the medical establishment may help to inform their self-presentation choices.

Indexed as

ClothingPhysician-Patient RelationsPhysiciansSocial PerceptionTrustAdultFemaleHumansMaleSex FactorsYoung Adultcompetencemedicineself‐presentationtrustwarmth

Identifiers

PMID41588684
PMCPMC12835578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.