Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41588664›Full record

ArticleAnatomical sciences education2026

Anatomy in Cuvier's Paris: Broadening participation through an international research program for historically minoritized undergraduates.

Jacqueline Cerda-Smith, Ashley R Deutsch, Adam Hartstone-Rose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jacqueline Cerda-SmithDepartment of Psychology, Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8094-8752
Ashley R DeutschDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8535-3280
Adam Hartstone-RoseDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5307-5573

Funding

National Science Foundation IRES-18-54244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most research programs recruit students with high grades, previous lab experience, and strong supervisor recommendations. However, these requirements can bar students from historically marginalized backgrounds from gaining these kinds of valuable experiences, thus contributing to the well documented limited diversity in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). To address this issue, we recruited three cohorts of undergraduate students from institutions with few research resources, regardless of academic success and previous research experience, to participate in an intensive, international research program. Therefore, participants in this study (N = 18, M

Indexed as

AnatomyResearchStudentsAcademiaCareer ChoiceCurriculumFemaleHumansMaleParisScienceSelf EfficacyUniversitiesWorkforce DiversityYoung Adultresearch self‐efficacyscience identitySTEM career interestsSTEM programming

Identifiers

PMID41588664
PMCPMC12996749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.