Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41588628›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of dental hygiene2026

The Patient-Centred Interdental Cleaning Concept-Consensus Based on a Round Table.

Tim M J A Thomassen, Dagmar E Slot, Christian Graetz, Nicola Discepoli, Johannes C Ehrenthal, Cornelia Frese, Inmaculada Tomás, Christof E Dörfer, Fridus G A Van der Weijden, Sonja Sälzer

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of dental hygiene, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tim M J A ThomassenDepartment of Periodontology Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2633-3236
Dagmar E SlotDepartment of Periodontology Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7234-0037
Christian GraetzClinic for Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, School for Dental Medicine, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8316-0565
Nicola DiscepoliUnit of Periodontology, Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1805-2899
Johannes C EhrenthalDepartment of Psychology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9428-3763
Cornelia FreseDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Clinic for Oral, Dental and Maxillofacial Diseases, Dental School, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9875-9290
Inmaculada TomásOral Sciences Research Group, Special Needs Unit, Department of Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Health Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), Santiago, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3317-0853
Christof E DörferClinic for Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, School for Dental Medicine, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2508-8075
Fridus G A Van der WeijdenDepartment of Periodontology Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5075-8384
Sonja SälzerClinic for Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, School for Dental Medicine, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9099-7750

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo consolidate clinical and scientific evidence and develop personalised recommendations for the optimal use of interdental devices, addressing the diverse needs of patients with varying oral health conditions based on the outcomes of an expert meeting. MATERIAL AND

methodsA round table meeting was convened, gathering nine qualified experts from various European countries, including clinicians and researchers. Through tailored pre-formulated questions and facilitated group discussions, well-defined clinical recommendations and considerations for future research were developed, addressing general guidelines and specific interdental hygiene recommendations alongside potential barriers to implementation.

resultsGeneral advice emphasises toothbrushing with fluoride toothpaste and integrating interdental cleaning into daily routines. Depending on early clinical signs and symptoms of caries and periodontal disease, interdental cleaning should become a consistent part of daily care. In general, interdental brushes are the preferred option. However, specific recommendations address conditions such as gingivitis, periodontitis, dental implants, caries, removable prostheses and orthodontic treatments. Recommendations also highlight various age groups, emphasising personalised approaches and prioritising interdental cleaning based on clinical indicators. In addition to the clinical situation, individual preferences and dexterity should be considered. For example, non-wired interdental cleaning devices may be more suitable for novice users, while an oral irrigator may be recommended for those with limited dexterity-for example, older adults or patients with special needs. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionBarriers to implementing interdental cleaning recommendations must be explored to provide practical solutions for the general population and dental care professionals. Strategies should include developing easily translatable educational content endorsed by professional societies to raise awareness, promoting behaviour change, tailoring care to individual needs, improving product usability, managing costs and addressing discomfort. It is also essential to align recommendations within the dental profession and prioritise interdental care in clinical practice, emphasising evidence-based guidelines and collaborative education efforts to ensure effective interdental hygiene practices are adopted.

Indexed as

Dental EquipmentOral HygienePatient-Centered CareHumansPatient Education as TopicTooth Diseasesbleedingdental care professionalgingivitisinterdental brushesinterdental cleaningperiodontal diseaseplaque

Identifiers

PMID41588628
PMCPMC13050390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.