ArticleBMC psychology2026
Caught in the web: how nomophobia mediates the link between neuroticism and phubbing.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The main purpose of the study is to examine the mediating role of nomophobia in the relationship between neurotic tendencies and phubbing levels of university students. A total of 730 (Female = 499, Male = 231) undergraduate and associate degree students studying at 3 different universities in the 2020-2021 academic year constitute the research group of this study. The research data were collected with tools: Personal Information Form, Horney-Coolidge Tridimensional Inventory, Nomophobia Scale and Phubbing Scale. According to the results obtained in the study, although the aggressive tendency has a significant relationship with phubbing, it does not explain it in the final model. However, according to the final model, the aggressive tendency indirectly explains phubbing through nomophobia. According to the findings, docile tendency, aggressive tendency, and nomophobia predict phubbing at the level of 52.9%. In addition, it was concluded that docile and aggressive tendencies significantly predict nomophobia at the level of 29.2%. When the results of the correlation analysis were examined, all variables were found to be significantly related to each other, except for the relationship between disconnected tendency and phubbing in the study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.