ReviewJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
Lower limb osseointegrated prosthetics: are we standing on the edge of a new era?
Review in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe advent of osseointegrated prosthetic systems marks a significant milestone in the evolution of limb reconstruction and rehabilitation. Osseointegration implants are a direct skeletal interface for artificial limbs, introduced as bone-anchored limb prostheses that may improve many limitations of traditional socket-based prosthetics, such as discomfort, poor fit, skin irritation, and limited range of motion. MAIN BODY: Since the discovery of the osseointegration phenomenon in 1940, several osseointegrated implant systems, such as OPRA, ILP, OPL, and ITAP, with varying biomechanical structures and surgical protocols, have been developed. Regardless of the system types, they have overall demonstrated better outcomes compared to socket-type prostheses. Although osseointegrated systems are not without complications, they are an optimum option if surgically and functionally possible for lower limb amputees, as they improve quality of life. SHORT
conclusionThis review provides a comparative analysis of current osseointegrated prosthetic systems for lower limb amputees, encompassing both commercially available devices and those under clinical investigation, with a focus on their biomechanical structures, surgical techniques, and reported clinical outcomes. It is hypothesized that these outcomes will continue to improve with newer designs and advancements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.