ArticleBMC medical education2026
Team-based learning in clinical pharmacology: a 5-year journey to a new course and increased students' self-confidence.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrescribing drugs is a complex skill that medical students usually need to demonstrate immediately upon graduation. Team-based learning, one of the student-centered teaching methods, is promising in fostering prescribing and medication optimization skills. This paper aims to share the step-by-step process of integrating team-based learning into clinical pharmacology course at Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, and demonstrate its benefit through changes in students’ self-confidence in selected skills.
methodsThe transition from the traditional format to team-based learning in clinical pharmacology was prompted by the positive experience of introducing structured case reports to the existing course. The transition itself began with defining the elements for team-based learning and continued with their harmonized, stepwise development. Teacher training was conducted simultaneously. The pilot team-based clinical pharmacology course was launched in the 2023/2024 academic year. A questionnaire was created to measure changes in students’ self-evaluation of their pharmacology general knowledge prior to and following the course, and to assess their level of self-confidence in eight prescribing and medication optimization skills. The voluntary questionnaire was disseminated to students enrolled in the pilot course (2023/2024). Responses were then compared with those collected from students enrolled in the traditional course (2022/2023).
resultsWe have developed a team-based clinical pharmacology course covering 15 transferable topics across medical specialties over five years. Each topic has pre-class reading and embedded concept-check exercises, alongside complementary video-lectures hosted on a training platform. Each topic is complemented by eight questions for a readiness assessment test and at least one virtual patient/scenario for team application. The particulars of each step and its time sequence constitute unique data not published in such details previously. The benefits of the transition manifested as a statistically significant difference in students’ self-confidence in six out of eight prescribing and medication optimization skills with a questionnaire response rate of 66% and 58%, respectively.
conclusionOur results demonstrate that team-based learning in clinical pharmacology is a feasible and beneficial approach that can potentially improve medical students’ confidence in prescribing skills. Although a one-size-fits-all approach is not possible, we provide guidance on transitioning from a traditional course to a team-based one.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.