ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2026
Left atrial strain in mitral valve disease: a comparative analysis of regurgitation and stenosis.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLeft atrial (LA) strain analysis is an emerging echocardiographic technique for assessing LA function. This study aimed to compare LA strain parameters in patients with mitral stenosis (MS) and mitral regurgitation (MR) to identify discriminators between these conditions.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 44 patients with moderate-to-severe MR and 44 patients with severe-to-very severe MS, all with normal left ventricular ejection fraction. Patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, ischemic mitral regurgitation, or atrial fibrillation were excluded. Clinical data were collected, and LA strain analysis was performed offline using EchoPAC software. The study analyzed LA reservoir, conduit, and contractile strain components.LAstrainSR, LAstrainCD and LAstrainCT were derived and analyzed for their diagnostic performance. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26.0, with one-way ANOVA used to compare LA strain parameters between groups.
resultsLAstrainCD demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy (81.8%) for differentiating MS from MR, making it the most reliable strain parameter. LAstrainCT showed the best performance for assessing MR severity, with a moderate accuracy of 61.5%.
conclusionThis study elucidates the distinct impacts of mitral stenosis and regurgitation on left atrial function, as reflected by LA strain parameters. LAstrainCD emerges as a key discriminator between these conditions, highlighting differences in atrial remodeling due to pressure and volume overload. Furthermore, LAstrainCT's correlation with MR severity enhances our understanding of atrial adaptation to regurgitant volume. These findings advance the knowledge of mitral valve disease pathophysiology, providing a foundation for improved diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.