Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41588454›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic pathology2026

TTF-1, CDX-2, PAX-8 and GATA-3 immunoexpression in a large serie of extrapulmonary small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas: a study of 138 cases.

Klára Pavlíčková, Petr Waldauf, Pavel Dundr, Marián Švajdler, Pavel Fabian, Iva Staniczková Zambo, Miroslava Flídrová, Jan Laco, Helena Hornychová, Patricie Delongová and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Klára PavlíčkováDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Thomayer University Hospital, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Vídeňská 800, Prague, 14059, Czech Republic.
Petr WaldaufDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel DundrDepartment of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Marián ŠvajdlerBioptická laboratoř s.r.o. and Šikl's Department of Pathology, Charles University, Medical Faculty in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Pavel FabianDepartment of Oncological Pathology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Iva Staniczková Zambo1st Institute of Pathologic Anatomy, St. Anne's University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Miroslava FlídrováDepartment of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan LacoThe Fingerland Department of Pathology, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové and University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Helena HornychováThe Fingerland Department of Pathology, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové and University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Patricie DelongováDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Pathology and Medical Genetics, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Jozef ŠkardaDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Pathology and Medical Genetics, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Jan HrudkaDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Radoslav MatějDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Thomayer University Hospital, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Vídeňská 800, Prague, 14059, Czech Republic. radoslav.matej@ftn.cz.

Funding

Agency for Health Research of the Czech Republic NU22-03-00130Charles University UNCE 24/MED/018 and Cooperatio Medical Diagnostics and Basic Medical SciencesEuropean Regional Development Fund BBMRI_CZ LM2023033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtrapulmonary small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (EP-SC) is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis. In our study, one hundred and thirty-eight EP-SCNC tissue samples underwent a complex analysis.

methodMulticentric study included 138 high-grade small cell carcinomas exhibiting neuroendocrine morphology without known pulmonary involvement. Using TMA, we studied the possible benefit of TTF-1 (DAKO, clone 8G7G3/1, dilution 1:200), CDX-2 (DAKO, ready to use kit DAK-CDX2), PAX-8 (Cell Marque, polyclonal, dilution 1:50) and GATA-3 (Cell Marque, clone L50-823, 1:200) immunohistochemical analyses for determining the primary site of EP-SCNC origin. For statistical analyses, the Kaplan-Meier, the Cox regressions analyses, the Pearson chi-square test and the Fisher’s exact test were used.

resultsThe median survival of our cohort was 11.5 months. Patients younger than 70 years had significantly better overall survival (p = 0.024). Across the full cohort, CDX-2 positivity was found in 19 tumors (13.9%), TTF-1 in 35 tumors (25.7%), PAX-8 in 63 tumors (46.3%) and GATA-3 in 8 tumors (6.5%), regardless of tumor origin. The expression of CDX-2, PAX-8 and GATA-3 did not differ significantly among different organ systems (p = 0.2; 0.3 and 0.12), respectively. The expression of TTF-1 differed significantly in tumors from various sites of origin (p = 0.009), expressed more often in breast, pancreatic, and genitourinary tumors. Interestingly, TTF-1 expression proved to have a negative prognostic impact relative to patient survival (age-adjusted Cox regression analysis, HR = 1.62, 95%CI:1.06–2.47, p = 0.021).

conclusionAs most patients with EP-SCNC had a metastatic presentation, finding the primary tumor origin, which is important for patient prognoses, is both challenging and important at the same time. Only TTF-1 immunohistochemical analysis proved to be helpful with this task. Moreover, a diagnosis of primary lung small cell carcinoma cannot be established based on TTF-1 positivity, since only 25.7% of EP-SCNC in our study displayed TTF-1 positivity.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, NeuroendocrineCarcinoma, Small CellTranscription FactorsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCDX2 Transcription FactorDNA-Binding ProteinsFemaleGATA3 Transcription FactorHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorCDX2 Transcription FactorDNA-Binding ProteinsGATA3 protein, humanGATA3 Transcription FactorPAX8 protein, humanPAX8 Transcription FactorTranscription FactorsTTF1 protein, humanCDX-2Extrapulmonary small cell neuroendocrine carcinomaGATA-3PAX-8TTF-1

Identifiers

PMID41588454
PMCPMC12857084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.