Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41588442›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026

Partial unicondylar arthroplasty with three-dimensional-printed porous tantalum prosthesis shows promising early results for focal osteochondral defects: a retrospective comparative study with average of 49.6-month follow-up.

Zhenlan Fu, Huaquan Fan, Puquan Wang, Zu Wan, Ran Xiong, Xin Chen, Jiayi Ma, Guangxing Chen, Fuyou Wang, Liu Yang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhenlan FuCenter for Joint Surgery, Intelligent Manufacturing and Rehabilitation Engineering Center, The First Affiliated Hospital (Southwest Hospital) of Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Huaquan FanCenter for Joint Surgery, Intelligent Manufacturing and Rehabilitation Engineering Center, The First Affiliated Hospital (Southwest Hospital) of Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Puquan WangCenter for Joint Surgery, Intelligent Manufacturing and Rehabilitation Engineering Center, The First Affiliated Hospital (Southwest Hospital) of Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Zu WanDepartment of Orthopaedics, People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force 920th Hospital, Kunming City, 650032, Yunnan Province, China.
Ran XiongCenter for Joint Surgery, Intelligent Manufacturing and Rehabilitation Engineering Center, The First Affiliated Hospital (Southwest Hospital) of Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Xin ChenCenter for Joint Surgery, Intelligent Manufacturing and Rehabilitation Engineering Center, The First Affiliated Hospital (Southwest Hospital) of Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Jiayi MaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China.
Guangxing ChenCenter for Joint Surgery, Intelligent Manufacturing and Rehabilitation Engineering Center, The First Affiliated Hospital (Southwest Hospital) of Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China. cgx7676@tmmu.edu.cn.
Fuyou WangCenter for Joint Surgery, Intelligent Manufacturing and Rehabilitation Engineering Center, The First Affiliated Hospital (Southwest Hospital) of Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China. wfy731023@tmmu.edu.cn.
Liu YangCenter for Joint Surgery, Intelligent Manufacturing and Rehabilitation Engineering Center, The First Affiliated Hospital (Southwest Hospital) of Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China. yangliu@tmmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the clinical and radiographic results of a novel partial unicondylar arthroplasty (PUCA) using a three-dimensional-printed (3DP) porous tantalum prosthesis for treating focal osteochondral defects (FOCD) of the femoral condyle, in comparison with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

methodsThis exploratory-retrospective matched-cohort consecutively enrolled study involved 17 patients: 8 in Group A (PUCA with 3DP porous tantalum prosthesis) from a larger trial and 9 in Group B (UKA), matched by age, gender, and BMI. Participants, aged 18-60, had femoral condylar FOCD with complete clinical and imaging data; exclusions included knee instability and incomplete data. Follow-ups were at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 months, and annually. The primary outcome was the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee score, with secondary outcomes including visual analogue scale (VAS), time to full-weight-bearing walking (FWBK), knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), Lysholm scores and range of motion (ROM). Prosthesis stability and Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading were assessed via radiograph, and postoperative complications were compared. Statistical analyses included the Mann-Whitney U test, independent-samples t test, and Fisher's Exact test.

resultsAll patients averaged 49.6 years old at surgery with a mean follow-up of 49.6 months. No demographic or complication differences were found between groups, and no revisions were needed. Preoperative scores were similar (P > 0.05). Postoperatively, Group A demonstrated significantly greater improvements in KL grades (1.5 ± 0.5 vs. 2.5 ± 0.5, P = 0.006), VAS (1.3 ± 0.5 vs. 2.5 ± 0.5, P = 0.002), HSS (92.3 ± 1.8 vs. 87.4 ± 1.6, P = 0.000), KOOS (90.9 ± 1.6 vs. 88.3 ± 1.9, P = 0.009), Lysholm (91.4 ± 2.4 vs. 88.5 ± 1.9, P = 0.019), and ROM (133.1° ± 6.5° vs. 115.6° ± 4.0°, P = 0.000), except for FWBK (4.9 ± 0.8 vs. 5.3 ± 0.5 weeks, P = 0.189). However, only the difference in ROM met the minimum clinically important difference. All postoperative scores, except for ROM and KL, showed statistically significant improvement compared with preoperative values in both groups radiographs at final follow-up showed stable prostheses in both groups with no signs of loosening. The statistical power for postoperative HSS was 1.0 (G*Power, effect size = 2.89).

conclusionThis initial study is the first to apply personalized PUCA with 3DP porous tantalum prostheses for FOCD, demonstrating promising early outcomes compared with UKA, such as delayed progression of osteoarthritis, effective pain relief, and improved knee function and quality of life. PUCA notably preserves more native tissue and adapts to individual defects, making it clinically feasible by offering a potentially better option for future FOCD management.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisPrinting, Three-DimensionalProsthesis DesignTantalumAdolescentAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPorosityRange of Motion, ArticularRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTantalum3D printingFemoral condyleFocal osteochondral defectPartial unicondylar arthroplastyPorous tantalum

Identifiers

PMID41588442
PMCPMC12914970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.