ArticleBMC surgery2026
HIBISCUS trial (hernia incidence with continuous barbed vs interrupted suturing in colorectal surgery with small incisions): a contemporary study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Article in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIncisional hernia is the most common long-term complication after abdominal surgery, including minimally invasive colorectal procedures. In Japan, fascial closure of small midline incisions is generally performed using interrupted suturing, but high-quality evidence comparing continuous barbed suturing with interrupted suturing is limited. Continuous closure may reduce the risk of incisional hernia; however, robust randomized data in laparoscopic and robot-assisted colorectal surgery are lacking. This study aims to determine whether continuous barbed suturing is superior to conventional interrupted suturing in preventing incisional hernia after minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery.
methodsThe HIBISCUS trial is a multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled study comparing continuous barbed suturing with interrupted monofilament suturing for fascial closure of mini-laparotomy incisions. Eligible adults with colorectal cancer undergoing elective laparoscopic or robot-assisted resection will be randomized 1:1 to continuous closure using a barbed absorbable suture (STRATAFIX Symmetric PDS Plus; bite width of 5 mm and stitch spacing of 5 mm) or interrupted closure using a monofilament absorbable suture (PDS Plus; bite width of 8 mm and stitch spacing of 8 mm). Only board-certified surgeons who complete a standardized pre-trial suturing competency assessment will be allowed to participate. The primary endpoint is the incidence of incisional hernia within 18 months after surgery, assessed mainly by scheduled abdominal CT imaging, with clinical examination as complementary. Secondary endpoints include fascial closure time, postoperative wound complications (including surgical site infection (SSI)), postoperative wound pain, and reoperation or readmission. All CT images will be independently reviewed by two blinded specialists. Based on power calculations, 422 patients will be enrolled. DISCUSSION: This trial will be the first randomized study to directly compare continuous barbed suturing with conventional interrupted suturing for small midline incisions in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. By standardizing suturing parameters and requiring surgeon competency verification, the HIBISCUS trial is designed to yield high-quality evidence on optimal fascial closure technique. The results are expected to influence clinical practice, inform guideline development, and contribute to the global standardization of abdominal wall closure practices.
trial registrationThis study is registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT1040250129). Registration date: November 21, 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.