ArticleHarm reduction journal2026
Benefits and barriers: a rapid-ethnographic study on the perspectives of potential and actual clients of Athens' drug consumption room.
Article in Harm reduction journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn April 2022, a new Drug Consumption Room (DCR) opened in Athens' city centre. To date, no qualitative research has evaluated the operational strengths and weaknesses of the site from the viewpoint of people who use drugs locally, including those who use the DCR and those who use in street-based settings who do not access the DCR.
methodsRapid-ethnographic fieldwork was conducted over a seven-week period. This comprised an initial five-week period of non-participant observation (≈ 200 h) followed by a community consultation regarding the research design and question protocols. Qualitative data were then collected through five focus groups with 24 regular DCR clients and 25 street-based interviews with non-DCR clients who consume drugs in street-based settings.
resultsRegular DCR clients reported increased physical, structural, and emotional safety and increased connection with auxiliary health and social services and staff and peers. Those who did not use the facility could see potential benefits but noted several operational and contextual barriers including anticipated stigma within the service and contextual and operational barriers.
conclusionAddressing DCR barriers could increase service access, reduce the presence and visibility of street-based drug use, and improve public health outcomes for people who use drugs in Athens. Indeed, some of these barriers have been addressed since the research was conducted (e.g. by expanding operating hours, increasing the number of staff with lived experience, offering on-site drug checking), illustrating the value of evaluating DCRs and subsequently adapting design and delivery based on the perspectives of actual and potential clients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.