ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Generating Training Data for Ureter Segmentation Using Dual-Energy CT Two-Material Decomposition.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the utility of dual-energy CT (DECT)-based two-material decomposition in facilitating the generation of training data for ureter segmentation. This retrospective two-center study included 180 patients who underwent DECT urography between April and July 2020, including 150 from Institution 1 and 30 from Institution 2. Virtual unenhanced (VUE) images were generated from the late excretory phase (LEP) images using a two-material decomposition technique. Ground truth segmentation masks were created by segmenting contrast-filled ureteral regions on LEP images and were then paired with the corresponding VUE images. These VUE images and their corresponding ground truth masks were used to construct training, validation, and test datasets. A deep learning-based segmentation model was developed using the nnU-Net framework. Its performance was evaluated using the Dice coefficient, precision, and recall. In the internal test dataset, the model achieved excellent performance, with a median Dice coefficient of 0.89 (95% CI 0.88-0.90), precision of 0.90 (95% CI 0.88-0.92), and recall of 0.88 (95% CI 0.86-0.91). In contrast, the external validation dataset yielded limited performance, with a median Dice coefficient of 0.43 (95% CI 0.31-0.61) and recall of 0.28 (95% CI 0.18-0.45), while precision remained high at 0.95 (95% CI 0.93-0.96). There were statistically significant differences in all metrics between the internal and external datasets (P < 0.01). DECT-based two-material decomposition is a feasible method for generating training data for ureter segmentation. Although external validation performance was limited, this approach shows promise for ureter segmentation on non-contrast CT scans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41588287What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.