ArticleBehavior research methods2026
A database of overlapping ambiguous strings in Chinese reading.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the absence of inter-word spaces, Chinese text sometimes presents word boundary ambiguity. One common case is the overlapping ambiguous string (OAS), a three-character string (ABC) where the middle character can form distinct words with both the character to its left (AB) and the character to its right (BC), creating segmentation ambiguity between AB-C and A-BC. This structure makes OASs a valuable tool for investigating the cognitive mechanisms of Chinese word segmentation. We introduce a comprehensive OAS database consisting of 952,497 OASs, each with 43 types of linguistic information at the character, word, and OAS levels. To illustrate how to use the database, we conducted an eye-tracking reading experiment manipulating whether the first character of the OAS (i.e., character A) could stand alone in sentences. Results showed that when character A could not stand alone, readers were more likely to group it with the next character B, leading to an AB-C segmentation. These findings validate the utility of the OAS database in understanding word segmentation during Chinese reading. The potential applications of the database in artificial intelligence, education, and writing system reform are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41588253What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.