ArticleNature chemical biology2026
De novo design of potent CRISPR-Cas13 inhibitors.
Article in Nature chemical biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Defining the essential genome of diverse phages with phage Tn-seq.Nature microbiology · 2026Article
- A structural accessibility principle for LbuCas13a activation by noncontiguous DNA.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Beyond DNA editing: how Cas13 redefined programmable RNA manipulation and what still limits its therapeutic promise.Nucleic acids research · 2026Review
- Synthetically designed anti-defense proteins overcome barriers to bacterial transformation and phage infection.Nature communications · 2026Article
- And… cut! - how conformational regulation of CRISPR-Cas effectors directs nuclease activity.The Biochemical journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CRISPR-Cas systems are transformative tools for gene editing that can be tuned or controlled by anti-CRISPRs (Acrs)-phage-derived inhibitors that regulate CRISPR-Cas activity. However, Acrs that can inhibit biotechnologically relevant CRISPR systems are relatively rare and challenging to discover. To overcome this limitation, we describe a highly successful and rapid approach that leverages de novo protein design to develop new-to-nature proteins for controlling CRISPR-Cas activity. Here, using Leptotrichia buccalis CRISPR-Cas13a as a representative example, we demonstrate that Acrs designed using artificial intelligence (AIcrs) are capable of highly potent and specific inhibition of CRISPR-Cas13a nuclease activity. We present a comprehensive workflow for design validation and demonstrate AIcr functionality in controlling CRISPR-Cas13 activity in bacterial and human cells. The ability to design bespoke inhibitors of Cas effectors will contribute to the ongoing development of CRISPR-Cas tools in diverse applications across research, medicine, agriculture and microbiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.