ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Shifting Paradigm: Utilization and Outcomes with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for cT4 and cN2 Colon Cancers.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUpfront surgical resection (USR) remains the standard of care for resectable, nonmetastatic colon cancer. However, for locally advanced (cT4) and high nodal burden (cN2) disease, we hypothesized that neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) would be associated with better overall survival compared with USR followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (AC).
methodsWe queried the National Cancer Database for nonmetastatic, microsatellite stable cT4 or cN2 colon cancer treated with USR followed by AC or NAC followed by surgical resection. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was utilized to determine covariates associated with receipt of NAC and with death. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used for overall survival (OS) analysis.
resultsA total of 10,394 patients with cT4 disease (8299 USR and 2095 NAC) and 7574 patients with cN2 disease (6205 USR and 1369 NAC) met criteria for study inclusion. Patients who were younger, healthier, and treated at academic centers were more likely to receive NAC. For both cohorts, NAC was associated with reduced margin positivity (cT4: 12.5% versus 20.5%, p < 0.001; cN2: 7.8% versus 12.5%, p < 0.001) and reduced positive lymph node ratio (LNR) (cT4: 8.7% versus 18.7%, p < 0.001; cN2: 17.3% versus 39%, p < 0.001). NAC was associated with better OS for cT4 (p = 0.003) and cN2 disease (p < 0.001), particularly cT3N2 and cT4N2.
conclusionsAmong cT4 and cN2 colon cancers, NAC was associated with reduced margin positivity, decreased lymph node ratio, and better OS. Our findings support the need for further investigation of NAC for locally advanced and high nodal burden colon cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41588177What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.