Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41588159›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Automated weed segmentation with knowledge based labeling for machine learning applications.

Thuan Ha, Kathryn Aldridge, Eric Johnson, Steve J Shirtliffe, Hansanee Fernando, Kwabena Nketia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thuan HaDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, S7N5A8, Canada. thuan.ha@usask.ca.
Kathryn AldridgeDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, S7N5A8, Canada.
Eric JohnsonDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, S7N5A8, Canada.
Steve J ShirtliffeDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, S7N5A8, Canada.
Hansanee FernandoDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, S7N5A8, Canada.
Kwabena NketiaDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, S7N5A8, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate classification of landscape features is essential for precision agriculture, supporting targeted practices such as weed control and variable-rate applications. Although machine and deep learning models show strong promise for real-time weed detection, they require large labelled datasets, which are costly and time-consuming to produce. This study develops and evaluates an automated feature-labelling workflow using eCognition (v9.5) for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) RGB imagery. The workflow was tested on a ~ 2000 m² research field at the University of Saskatchewan using high-resolution imagery (0.088 cm). The field contained strips of kochia, wild oat, wild mustard, and false cleavers seeded between wheat rows. The workflow combines multiple spatial algorithms, including segmentation, line detection, distance mapping, convolution filtering, morphological operations, and thresholding. Vegetation indices such as the Colour Index of Vegetation and Excess Green Index effectively separated crops and weeds from soil. Using randomly distributed labelling points and a confusion matrix, the workflow achieved 87% overall accuracy (kappa = 0.81) without manual training labels. This automated workflow demonstrates strong potential for accelerating dataset creation for machine learning and deep learning applications, reducing manual effort while maintaining accuracy. Future work will focus on improving its transferability across fields, dates, and experimental conditions.

Indexed as

Automated labelingECognitionImage segmentationPrecision agricultureUAV RGB imageryWeed detection

Identifiers

PMID41588159
PMCPMC12905259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.