Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41588141›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

A novel patient-centered outcome in cancer care, days at home: a scoping review and guide for its future use.

Tiago Ribeiro, Adom Bondzi-Simpson, Alyson Mahar, Angela Jerath, Victoria Barabash, Frances C Wright, Ekaterina Kosyachkova, Julie Deleemans, Natalie Coburn, Julie Hallet

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tiago RibeiroDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Adom Bondzi-SimpsonDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Alyson MaharSchool of Nursing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Angela JerathInstitute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Victoria BarabashClinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Frances C WrightDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ekaterina KosyachkovaMy Gut Feeling - Stomach Cancer Foundation of Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Julie DeleemansCumming School of Medicine, Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Natalie CoburnDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Julie HalletDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. Julie.hallet@sunnybrook.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDays at home (DAH) is a global measure that measures time spent outside of healthcare institutions. There is currently no consensus regarding use, terms, or definitions. We conducted a scoping review to map the literature on DAH in cancer research, highlight its use, and perform an analysis to guide future use.

methodsThe objectives and methods were published a priori and designed using the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and Arksey and O'Malley's expanded framework. The final search was run for Medline, Embase, and Scopus in February 2024 and captured adult cancer research where DAH, or equivalent, was measured. DAH was defined as a composite outcome, recording the time a patient spends alive and outside of healthcare institutions.

resultsOf 1022 studies screened, 53 were included. The number of publications increased annually across study designs, with 16 studies published in 2023. DAH was assessed across multiple cancer populations, most commonly evaluating a heterogeneous cohort of cancer patients (14 studies, 26.4%). Sixteen unique terms were used to capture DAH, with days at home being most common (17 studies, 32%). There was variability in terms used, definitions applied, handling of death, and statistical methods when examining DAH. Several patient, cancer, treatment, and system level factors were associated with DAH across multiple cancer populations.

conclusionDAH may bridge the gap between methodologic rigor, data accessibility, and patient-centeredness in cancer research. There is considerable variability in terms, definitions, and reporting. With a view to coordinating the growing body of literature, we have shared considerations guided by this review to improve future use.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsHumansPatient-Centered CareTime FactorsCancer careDays at homePatient-centered outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.