Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41588114›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2026

The role of ovarian hormones in risk aversion in female rats.

Leah M Truckenbrod, Nadia Carlos, Megan Kelly, Merrick Garner, Madeline Streifer, Andrea C Gore, Caitlin A Orsini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leah M TruckenbrodDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Nadia CarlosDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Megan KellyDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Merrick GarnerDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Madeline StreiferDivision of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Andrea C GoreDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Caitlin A OrsiniDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. Caitlin.orsini@austin.utexas.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5644-2316

Funding

Investigation of the neurobiological mechanisms underlying estradiol-mediated risk aversion in femalesR01DA055676 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Caitlin Anne Orsini · 2023 to 2026
$1.8M
Neural circuits and mechanisms underlying maladaptive risk-taking following cocaine self-administrationR00DA041493 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI ORSINI, CAITLIN ANNE · 2019 to 2021
$745k
Neurobiology of risk taking in females: hormonal modulation of basolateral amygdala functionF31DA057112 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI TRUCKENBROD, LEAH MARIE · 2022 to 2024
$114k
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) F31DA057112U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) R00DA041493U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) R01DA055676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decision making involving risk of punishment is a cognitive process characterized by sex-specific phenotypes, with females exhibiting greater risk aversion than males. Although prior research has demonstrated that ovarian hormones, and estradiol (E2) in particular, contribute to increased risk aversion in females, the receptor mechanisms underlying these effects remain unknown. Further, it is unclear what role the other key ovarian hormone progesterone (P4) plays in female risk aversion. Accordingly, the current set of experiments were designed to address these gaps in knowledge of the hormonal basis of female risk-taking behavior. Female rats were trained in a punishment-based risky decision-making task, ovariectomized, and then retested in the decision-making task. Rats were then treated with estradiol benzoate (Experiment 1; EB), estrogen receptor (ER) agonists (Experiment 2) or progesterone (Experiment 3; P4) after daily test sessions for 7 days. Consistent with prior work, OVX increased risk taking, and EB administration attenuated this effect. Administration of an ERα agonist, either alone or with an ERβ agonist, similarly mitigated the effects of OVX on risk taking. In contrast, the ERβ agonist alone was ineffective in restoring risk aversion in OVX females. Control tests confirmed that the effects of the ERα agonist on risk taking were not due to altered food motivation or footshock sensitivity. Finally, P4 administration did not alter risk taking in OVX females and did not inhibit EB's behavioral effects. Collectively, these data reveal that E2 is the critical ovarian hormone that promotes female risk aversion; further, they suggest that the likely mechanism by which E2 influences risk aversion in females is through activation of ERα.

Indexed as

Decision MakingEstradiolProgesteroneRisk-TakingAnimalsEstrogensFemaleOvariectomyOvaryRatsRats, Long-EvansEstradiolestradiol 3-benzoateEstrogensProgesterone

Identifiers

PMID41588114
PMCPMC13013617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.