ArticleScientific reports2026
Computational artificial intelligence modeling and optimization of nutrient removal in microalgae membrane bioreactors using ANN and RSM.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Microalgae-Driven Circular Agriculture: System Integration, Nutrient Recovery, and AI-Assisted Optimization.Microorganisms · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biological based methods for wastewater treatment are preferred because of they are more economical and environmentally friendly. This work sought to predict microalgae membrane bioreactor (MBR) levels of ammonia nitrogen, phosphate concentration, and removal efficiency. Forecasting the values in the study using artificial neural network (ANN) modeling and response surface methodology (RSM). According to the data, the RSM model accurately estimates the effectiveness of phosphate, nitrogen, and ammonia removal. The R2 values of 0.9733 and 0.9608 help to justify the significant correlation between the predictions of the model and the removal efficiencies. The model uses time to predict the removal effectiveness of these contaminants, along with TOC content. Moreover, the performance metrics for ANN designs are R2 coefficient of determination of 0.99791, mean squared error (MSE) of 3.57E-02 for ammonia nitrogen, and R2 coefficient of determination of 0.99722 and MSE of 2.75E-02 for phosphate concentration. Nonetheless, variations between the actual data and the ANN’s predictions suggest possible limits in the model or experimental design. Furthermore, using RSM and NSGA-II in the optimization process demonstrated the model’s ability to accurately pinpoint the ideal circumstances for removing nutrients from the bioreactor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.