Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41588098›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Computational artificial intelligence modeling and optimization of nutrient removal in microalgae membrane bioreactors using ANN and RSM.

Nadia Ghezaiel Hammouda, Karim Kriaa, Ahmed Mohsin Alsayah, Husam Rajab, Narinderjit Singh Sawaran Singh, Khalil Hajlaoui, Walid Aich, Mohammad Jadidi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nadia Ghezaiel HammoudaDepartment of Software Engineering, College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Ha'il, Ha'il city, Saudi Arabia.
Karim KriaaCollege of Engineering, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed Mohsin AlsayahRefrigeration and Air-condition Department, Technical Engineering College, The Islamic University, Najaf, Iraq.
Husam RajabCollege of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Najran University, King Abdulaziz Road, P.O Box 1988, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Narinderjit Singh Sawaran SinghFaculty of Data Science and Information Technology, INTI International University, Persiaran Perdana BBN, Putra Nilai, Nilai 71800, Malaysia.
Khalil HajlaouiCollege of Engineering, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Walid AichDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Ha'il, Ha'il City, 81451, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad JadidiIslamic Azad University, Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Amol, Iran. MohammadJadidi1404@proton.me.

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research at Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU) IMSIU-DDRSP2502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological based methods for wastewater treatment are preferred because of they are more economical and environmentally friendly. This work sought to predict microalgae membrane bioreactor (MBR) levels of ammonia nitrogen, phosphate concentration, and removal efficiency. Forecasting the values in the study using artificial neural network (ANN) modeling and response surface methodology (RSM). According to the data, the RSM model accurately estimates the effectiveness of phosphate, nitrogen, and ammonia removal. The R2 values of 0.9733 and 0.9608 help to justify the significant correlation between the predictions of the model and the removal efficiencies. The model uses time to predict the removal effectiveness of these contaminants, along with TOC content. Moreover, the performance metrics for ANN designs are R2 coefficient of determination of 0.99791, mean squared error (MSE) of 3.57E-02 for ammonia nitrogen, and R2 coefficient of determination of 0.99722 and MSE of 2.75E-02 for phosphate concentration. Nonetheless, variations between the actual data and the ANN’s predictions suggest possible limits in the model or experimental design. Furthermore, using RSM and NSGA-II in the optimization process demonstrated the model’s ability to accurately pinpoint the ideal circumstances for removing nutrients from the bioreactor.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBioreactorsMicroalgaeNeural Networks, ComputerNutrientsWater PurificationAmmoniaMembranes, ArtificialNitrogenPhosphatesWastewaterAmmoniaMembranes, ArtificialNitrogenPhosphatesWastewaterANNMembrane bioreactorPhosphateWastewater and treatment

Identifiers

PMID41588098
PMCPMC12886754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.