ArticleScientific reports2026
Screening oral health in older adults: accuracy of the Oral Health Screener for use within the interRAI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06536322 (Process and Outcome Evaluation of the Optimized Oral Health-related Section of the Belgian Resident Assessment Instrument and Its Training), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Process and Outcome Evaluation of the Optimized Oral Health-related Section of the Belgian Resident Assessment Instrument and Its Training: a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Regular assessment is essential to maintain oral health in nursing home residents, but access to professional dental care is often limited. The Oral Health Screener within the interRAI instruments (OHS) allows caregivers without dental background to identify potential oral problems. This study evaluated the accuracy of the OHS items Oral hygiene, Teeth, and Gums against established dental indices. Dental professionals assessed 458 residents (mean age 82.7 ± 7.8 years, 70.3% female; 53.9% dentate) using the OHS, Oral Hygiene Index, Modified Gingival Index, and Pulp Ulceration Fistula Abscess index. For item Oral Hygiene, 76.4% of residents were rated as poor, with 86.4% sensitivity and 68.3% specificity. Item Teeth identified poor condition in 56.9%, with 96.2% sensitivity and 74.2% specificity. The Gums item scored poor in 78.2%, with 94.0% sensitivity and 60.6% specificity. Predictive values and likelihood ratios supported clinical utility. The findings indicate that the OHS has fair to considerable diagnostic accuracy as a screening instrument for identifying insufficient oral hygiene, tooth decay and gum problems in nursing home residents. It can support non-dental caregivers in early detection and intervention, reducing risk of progression, and supporting better oral health in residents.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06536322 July 23rd, 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.