Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41588085›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Screening oral health in older adults: accuracy of the Oral Health Screener for use within the interRAI.

Patricia Ann Ivonne Vandenbulcke, Johanna de Almeida Mello, Emilie Schoebrechts, Jan De Lepeleire, Anja Declercq, Dominique Declerck, Joke Duyck

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06536322 (Process and Outcome Evaluation of the Optimized Oral Health-related Section of the Belgian Resident Assessment Instrument and Its Training), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06536322 naunknown statusnot on this map

Process and Outcome Evaluation of the Optimized Oral Health-related Section of the Belgian Resident Assessment Instrument and Its Training: a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKU LeuvenRan2022 to 2025Enrolled462ConditionsOral Health, Old Age, Dementia, Long-Term CareArmsOHS-interRAI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patricia Ann Ivonne VandenbulckeDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, Population Studies in Oral Health, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, Box 7001, Leuven, 3000, Belgium. patricia.vandenbulcke@kuleuven.be.
Johanna de Almeida MelloDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, Population Studies in Oral Health, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, Box 7001, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Emilie SchoebrechtsDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, Population Studies in Oral Health, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, Box 7001, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Jan De LepeleireDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Center for General Practice, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 blok H, Box 7001, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Anja DeclercqCentre for Care Research, LUCAS, KU Leuven, Minderbroedersstraat 8, Box 5310, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Dominique DeclerckDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, Population Studies in Oral Health, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, Box 7001, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Joke DuyckDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, Population Studies in Oral Health, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, Box 7001, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek TBM T003220NKU Leuven C24M-20-063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regular assessment is essential to maintain oral health in nursing home residents, but access to professional dental care is often limited. The Oral Health Screener within the interRAI instruments (OHS) allows caregivers without dental background to identify potential oral problems. This study evaluated the accuracy of the OHS items Oral hygiene, Teeth, and Gums against established dental indices. Dental professionals assessed 458 residents (mean age 82.7 ± 7.8 years, 70.3% female; 53.9% dentate) using the OHS, Oral Hygiene Index, Modified Gingival Index, and Pulp Ulceration Fistula Abscess index. For item Oral Hygiene, 76.4% of residents were rated as poor, with 86.4% sensitivity and 68.3% specificity. Item Teeth identified poor condition in 56.9%, with 96.2% sensitivity and 74.2% specificity. The Gums item scored poor in 78.2%, with 94.0% sensitivity and 60.6% specificity. Predictive values and likelihood ratios supported clinical utility. The findings indicate that the OHS has fair to considerable diagnostic accuracy as a screening instrument for identifying insufficient oral hygiene, tooth decay and gum problems in nursing home residents. It can support non-dental caregivers in early detection and intervention, reducing risk of progression, and supporting better oral health in residents.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06536322 July 23rd, 2024.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningOral HealthAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleNursing Home ResidentsNursing HomesOral HygieneOral Hygiene IndexSensitivity and SpecificityGeriatric assessment(MeSH): sensitivity and specificityNursing homesOral diagnosisOral hygiene indexPredictive value of tests

Identifiers

PMID41588085
PMCPMC12905425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.