ArticleScientific reports2026
Nested PCR as a superior diagnostic method for Acanthamoeba keratitis compared to conventional techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early plasma cell-free DNA diagnosis of fatalIDCases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) is a severe eye infection that can cause severe vision loss, especially in contact lens wearers. Rapid and accurate diagnosis is crucial for achieving favorable outcomes. Traditional methods, such as culture, are slow and have variable sensitivity, while molecular techniques offer improved detection. This study evaluated nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting the 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene for rapid AK diagnosis, comparing its performance to one-step PCR, culture, and in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM). This study included 42 suspected AK patients who underwent IVCM and corneal scraping for culture, PCR, and nested PCR. AK diagnosis was confirmed based on clinical findings, risk factors, treatment response, and at least one positive diagnostic test. Out of 42 patients, 27 were positive for Acanthamoeba with at least one of the diagnostic methods. Based on the diagnosis of definite AK, the sensitivity of IVCM, culture, PCR, and nested PCR was 77.78%, 37.04%, 62.96%, and 96.3%, respectively. The specificity and positive predictive values were 100% for all the tests. The negative predictive values of IVCM, culture, PCR, and nested PCR were 71.43%, 46.88%, 60%, and 93.75%, respectively. Nested PCR results displayed the highest agreement with IVCM. In conclusion, nested PCR enhances AK detection compared to conventional methods, improving sensitivity in low corneal scrape quantities. Combining high-sensitivity tests increases diagnostic accuracy, and nested PCR with IVCM is the most effective approach. When IVCM is unavailable, nested PCR serves as a reliable diagnostic tool, especially when culture and one-step PCR yield negative results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.