ArticleScientific reports2026
Mitochondrial protective effects of ellagic acid in a rat model of sporadic Alzheimer's disease induced by STZ.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Semaglutide on Hippocampal Injury in a Streptozotocin-Induced Model of Alzheimer's Disease.Biomedicines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder primarily affecting the elderly, characterized by mitochondrial dysfunction. Mitochondria play a dual role in AD, serving both as the main source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and as a major target of oxidative damage. This study aimed to investigate the protective mechanisms of ellagic acid (EA) a natural dietary polyphenol on mitochondrial function in an intracerebroventricular (ICV) streptozotocin (STZ)-injected rat model of AD. Rats were randomly assigned to six groups: Control, Sham, STZ (1.5 mg/kg on days 1 and 3), STZ + EA 5 mg/kg, STZ + EA 50 mg/kg, and STZ + EA 100 mg/kg. On day 14, behavioral tests (Shuttle box and Step-down), histopathological evaluations, oxidative stress markers, and mitochondrial indices were assessed in brain tissue. Treatment with EA (100 mg/kg) significantly improved spatial memory, as evidenced by increased latency time in the Morris water maze test (p < 0.001). Furthermore, EA treatment mitigated hippocampal neurodegeneration, increasing neuronal density in the CA1 subfield (p < 0.001) and restoring total hippocampal volume (p < 0.01). At the biochemical level, EA markedly reduced oxidative stress levels (p < 0.001) and enhanced mitochondrial function, restoring cortical ATP levels (p < 0.001) and cytochrome c oxidase activity (p < 0.01) compared to the STZ- group. In conclusion, these findings suggest that EA may have therapeutic potential in mitigating mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in AD, offering a promising approach for addressing neurodegeneration and energy deficits associated with the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.