Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41588011›Full record

ArticleMicrosystems & nanoengineering2026

Optimal inter-electrode distances for maximizing single unit yield per electrode in neural recordings.

Domokos Meszéna, Ward Fadel, Róbert Tóth, Angelique C Paulk, Sydney S Cash, Ziv Williams, Tamás Kiss, Marcell Stippinger, Lucia Wittner, Richárd Fiáth and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Domokos MeszénaHUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Integrative Neuroscience Group, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4042-2542
Ward FadelHUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Integrative Neuroscience Group, Budapest, Hungary.
Róbert TóthHUN-REN Wigner Research Center for Physics, Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics, Department of Computational Sciences, Theoretical Neuroscience and Complex Systems Research Group, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4531-3337
Angelique C PaulkCenter for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Sydney S CashCenter for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4557-6391
Ziv WilliamsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Tamás KissHUN-REN Wigner Research Center for Physics, Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics, Department of Computational Sciences, Theoretical Neuroscience and Complex Systems Research Group, Budapest, Hungary.
Marcell StippingerHUN-REN Wigner Research Center for Physics, Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics, Department of Computational Sciences, Theoretical Neuroscience and Complex Systems Research Group, Budapest, Hungary.
Lucia WittnerHUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Integrative Neuroscience Group, Budapest, Hungary.
Richárd Fiáth *HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Integrative Neuroscience Group, Budapest, Hungary. fiath.richard@ttk.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8732-2691
Zoltán Somogyvári *HUN-REN Wigner Research Center for Physics, Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics, Department of Computational Sciences, Theoretical Neuroscience and Complex Systems Research Group, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4385-3025

Funding

Magyar Tudományos Akadémia (Hungarian Academy of Sciences) Bolyai János ScholarshipMagyar Tudományos Akadémia (Hungarian Academy of Sciences) Hungarian Brain Research Program Grant (NAP2022-I-2/2022).Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal (NKFI Office) 2019-2.1.7-ERA-NET-2021-00023Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal (NKFI Office) K135837Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal (NKFI Office) PD143582Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal (NKFI Office) STARTING_24, Project no. 150574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

State-of-the-art high-density multielectrode arrays enable the recording of simultaneous spiking activity from hundreds of neurons. Although significant efforts have been dedicated to enhancing neural recording devices and developing more efficient sorting algorithms, there has been relatively less focus on the allocation of microelectrodes-a factor that undeniably affects spike sorting effectiveness and ultimately the total number of detected neurons. Here, we systematically examined the relationship between optimal electrode spacing and spike sorting efficiency by creating virtual sparser layouts from high-density recordings through spatial downsampling. We assessed spike sorting performance by comparing the quantity of well-isolated single units per electrode in sparse configurations across various brain regions (neocortex and thalamus), species (rat, mouse, and human) and various spike-sorting algorithms. Enabling the theoretical estimation of optimal electrode arrangements, we complement experimental results with a geometrical modeling framework. Contrary to the general assumption that higher electrode density inherently leads to more efficient sorting, both our theoretical and experimental results reveal a clear optimum for electrode spacing specific to species and regions. We demonstrate that carefully choosing optimal electrode distances could yield a total of 1.7-3.75 times increase in spike sorting efficiency. These findings emphasize the necessity of species- and region-specific microelectrode design optimization.

Identifiers

PMID41588011
PMCPMC12835126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.