Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41587888›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of African medicine2026

Evaluation of Gustatory and Olfactory Perception in Type II Diabetic Patients - A Clinical Observational Study.

Vinitha Ganesh, Durgadevi Pancharethinam, Ezhilarasi Arumugam Venkatachalam Sargurunathan, R Ignatious Jeba Mary, Kumar Appusamy, Ramachandra Reddy Gowda Venkatesha

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of African medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vinitha GaneshOral and Maxillofacial Radiologist, Private Practitioner, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Durgadevi PancharethinamDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, BIHER, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ezhilarasi Arumugam Venkatachalam SargurunathanDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, JKK Nattraja Dental College, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India.
R Ignatious Jeba MaryDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Vinayaka Mission's Sankarachariyar Dental College, Vinayaka Mission's Research Foundation (Deemed to be University), Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
Kumar AppusamyDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Vinayaka Mission's Sankarachariyar Dental College, Vinayaka Mission's Research Foundation (Deemed to be University), Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ramachandra Reddy Gowda VenkateshaDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Vinayaka Mission's Sankarachariyar Dental College, Vinayaka Mission's Research Foundation (Deemed to be University), Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDiabetes mellitus is a metabolic syndrome characterized by hyperglycemia and disturbances in the metabolism of carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids. Taste and smell may influence the acceptance or rejection of food, and abnormalities in taste and smell receptors are known to influence the intake of specific foods, thus increasing the risk of obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome.

aimTo estimate the random blood sugar (RBS) levels, assess the taste and smell perception in type II diabetic patients and healthy individuals. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study was carried out in 120 individuals (Group A-60 type II diabetics and Group B-60 healthy individuals). Blood samples of 120 participants were collected, and RBS levels were measured. The smell test was conducted by Sniffin's sticks test using six commercially available scent-tip pens. The taste test was conducted by soaking sterile cotton pads in 4 different solutions (quinine sulfate, sucrose, sodium chloride, and citric acid) and applying them over the dorsum of the tongue one after the other, and the results were recorded.

resultsAmong the 120 subjects, Group A subjects showed reduced taste identification than the Group B subjects. A highly statistically significant difference was found in age, smell, and RBS (mg%) between Group A and Group B. Furthermore, among the two groups, impairment of taste identification was higher in the group A subjects. There was a statistically significant association in the identification of sweet, salt, and sour taste among the Group A and Group B subjects.

conclusionFrom the results of the study, we infer that the identification of smell, salty, sweet, and sour taste was impaired in type II diabetic patients.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Olfaction DisordersOlfactory PerceptionSmellTasteTaste PerceptionAdultAgedBlood GlucoseCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBlood Glucoseacidediabète de type IIGlucosegoûtodoratsaltselsmellSniffin’s sticks testsoursucrésweettastetest Sniffin’s Stickstype II diabetes

Identifiers

PMID41587888
PMCPMC13249373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.