Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41587840›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine2026

Educating Medical Trainees About Patient-Centered Documentation in the Time of Open Notes.

Elizabeth A Fleming, Nyla E Mathis, Magnolia J Larson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Life is Larger Than Science.Annals of family medicine · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elizabeth A FlemingDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin Liz.Fleming@fammed.wisc.edu.
Nyla E MathisUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
Magnolia J LarsonDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Communication and clinical documentation are core competencies of medical education. With the adoption of open notes, patients have direct access to what clinicians document in their electronic health records. This has transformed clinical documentation from an administrative record-keeping and billing tool into a form of communication with patients. Students should be taught that notes are an extension of the visit that can impact the patient-physician relationship. In the context of relationship-centered care, where the focus lies on the quality of interactions among patients, clinicians, and the broader care team, the language and tone of documentation take on new significance. Clinical notes that are inclusive, respectful, and reflective of the patient's lived experience can help affirm their role as active participants in their care and strengthen the therapeutic alliance. Conversely, depersonalized, biased, or judgmental language may undermine these relationships and negatively affect outcomes. As educators and clinicians, we must train health professional students not only to document with clinical accuracy but also to write in ways that reflect empathy, reduce bias, and promote shared understanding. Patient-centered documentation is a practical and powerful tool for advancing relationship-centered care and improving the experience of both patients and clinicians.

Indexed as

DocumentationEducation, MedicalElectronic Health RecordsPatient-Centered CareCommunicationHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsStudents, Medicaleducation/curriculuminformation management/informatics: electronic health recordsprimary care issues: clinician-patient communication/relationshipprimary care issues: patient-centered care

Identifiers

PMID41587840
PMCPMC12834586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.