Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41587832›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine2026

Patient Valuation of Visit Types, Speed of Care, and Continuity With Primary Care Physicians: A Discrete-Choice Survey.

Katherine J Gold, Dongru Chen, John Holkeboer, Gregory Shumer, Lauren Marshall, Devon Kinney, Ananda Sen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katherine J GoldDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan ktgold@umich.edu.
Dongru ChenDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
John HolkeboerDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Gregory ShumerDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Lauren MarshallDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Devon KinneyDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ananda SenDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSince the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been rapid uptake of portal messaging by patients to address acute and chronic health conditions. Demand for in-person appointments has remained high. It is not known how US patients value trade-offs between rapid portal care, a shorter wait for a visit with any available physician, or a longer wait to see their primary care physician. We used a discrete-choice experiment to elicit patient preferences for different types of care delivery and clinician type, varying time to appointment.

methodsIn 2023 our academic family medicine department queried adult patients about 6 theoretical health concerns and asked them to choose among 4 modes of care with different time frames. The modes of care were: (1) portal messaging with their primary care physician; (2) video visit with a different physician; (3) video visit with their primary care physician; or (4) in-person visit with their primary care physician. We weighted results by gender, race, and age and calculated patient preferences overall and by demographic subcategories.

resultsWe received 2,268 usable surveys out of 2,411 (50.4%) responses from 4,780 surveys sent. For all 6 health concerns, patients opted for a 3-day portal message response from their primary care physician over a longer wait for video or in-person visits with their primary care physician or with another physician.

conclusionsPrimary care patients expressed a robust preference for rapid-response portal messaging to address health needs. This raises important concerns about how to support patient desires for this mode care while restructuring primary care infrastructure to ensure financial support for continued safe and sustainable primary care.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareCOVID-19Office VisitsPatient PreferencePhysicians, Primary CarePrimary Health CareAccess to Primary CareAdultAgedAppointments and SchedulesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient PortalsSARS-CoV-2access to primary carefamily practicepatient portalpatient preferencetelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID41587832
PMCPMC12834589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.