ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2026
Virtual Imaging-Guided Harmonization of Chest X-rays Using a Generative Adversarial Neural Network.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo reduce variability in chest radiography (CXR) from acquisition and post-processing, and assess whether harmonization improves image quality and down-stream diagnostic performance.
methodsA generative adversarial network (GAN) was trained exclusively on virtual images produced by a Virtual Imaging Trial (VIT). The model maps non-harmonized CXRs to noise-free, unprocessed references using a dual U-Net with contrastive loss. Evaluation spanned virtual, physical-phantom, and clinical data using generic (GIQMs) and chest-specific (CIQMs) metrics. A phantom benchmark compared the method with ComBat harmonization and a conventional denoising algorithm. Clinical generalization was tested on VinDr-CXRs, examining feature compactness via Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP). We also assessed NIH-CXRs, quantifying diagnostic accuracy with bootstrap uncertainty.
resultsCompared with non-harmonized images, harmonized CXRs yielded approximately 89% lower NRMSE, 50% higher PSNR, and 86% higher SSIM. On phantom data, CIQM variability fell from 0.255 to 0.026 and was reduced more consistently than with ComBat or denoising. Clinical analyses on VinDr-CXRs showed tighter UMAP clusters for harmonized features, indicating suppression of acquisition-related variability. On NIH-CXRs, training and testing a classifier in the harmonized domain improved diagnostic accuracy over the non-harmonized domain and lowered cross-domain sensitivity; pleural and cardiac categories showed consistent gains, while texture-dependent labels exhibited task-dependent effects.
conclusionVIT-guided training enables a GAN to harmonize CXRs toward a raw reference, improving quantification variability and harmonizing image representations across systems. SIGNIFICANCE: The proposed virtual-to-clinical strategy is scalable and generalizable, offering a practical path to standardized CXR appearance and reliable downstream detection across institutions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.