ArticleJMIR formative research2026
Requirements and Use Cases for eHealth Solutions in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment Teams: Design Science Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Health care delivery is often fragmented, with different services being delivered by different organizations. Various forms of teamwork are often used in health care, aiming to mitigate the challenges related to this fragmentation. One example of teamwork in mental health is Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT). FACT is a model for comprehensive and integrated care for patients with long-term, serious mental illness. FACT teams deliver services using assertive outreach to treat patients who can be hard to reach by health care services. However, Norwegian FACT teams have issues with the current eHealth solutions related to the fragmentation of health care. Objective: This study aimed to identify requirements and develop use cases and use case diagrams for eHealth solutions that support effective teamwork within FACT teams, using them in a case study for collaborative health care delivery. Methods: A design science framework was used to explicate the problems of eHealth solutions in FACT teams. This included performing the subactivities of defining the problem precisely, positioning and justifying the problem, and finding root causes. Based on this explication, we derived a set of requirements, use cases, and use case diagrams for FACT teams. Results: We present the explication of the problems of eHealth in Norwegian FACT teams. Building on the results, we present functional and nonfunctional requirements for electronic health records, electronic whiteboards, video conference solutions, and digital questionnaires. Improved integration across these systems was identified as a recurring need. We also provide use cases and diagrams illustrating system use in practice. Conclusions: FACT teams in Norway require more integrated and tailored eHealth solutions. The requirements and use cases presented in this study offer a foundation for developing tools that better support the collaborative and mobile nature of FACT team operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.