Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41587213›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2026

Anti-orthopoxvirus drugs inhibit lumpy skin disease virus replication by targeting viral DNA polymerase.

Zuxin Gong, Jiaqi Dai, Hailong Qu, Yongxin Hu, Fanqi Sun, Chenchen Liu, Xin Li, Chunyan Feng, Zhiliang Wang, Zhen Yang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zuxin GongKey Laboratory of Animal Diseases Diagnostic and Immunology, Ministry of Agriculture, MOE International Joint Collaborative Research Laboratory for Animal Health & Food Safety, The Belt and Road International Sci-Tech Innovation Institute of Transboundary Animal Disease Diagnosis and Immunization, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Jiaqi DaiKey Laboratory of Animal Diseases Diagnostic and Immunology, Ministry of Agriculture, MOE International Joint Collaborative Research Laboratory for Animal Health & Food Safety, The Belt and Road International Sci-Tech Innovation Institute of Transboundary Animal Disease Diagnosis and Immunization, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Hailong QuChina Animal Health and Epidemiology Center, Qingdao, China.
Yongxin HuChina Animal Health and Epidemiology Center, Qingdao, China.
Fanqi SunKey Laboratory of Animal Diseases Diagnostic and Immunology, Ministry of Agriculture, MOE International Joint Collaborative Research Laboratory for Animal Health & Food Safety, The Belt and Road International Sci-Tech Innovation Institute of Transboundary Animal Disease Diagnosis and Immunization, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Chenchen LiuKey Laboratory of Animal Diseases Diagnostic and Immunology, Ministry of Agriculture, MOE International Joint Collaborative Research Laboratory for Animal Health & Food Safety, The Belt and Road International Sci-Tech Innovation Institute of Transboundary Animal Disease Diagnosis and Immunization, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Xin LiKey Laboratory of Animal Diseases Diagnostic and Immunology, Ministry of Agriculture, MOE International Joint Collaborative Research Laboratory for Animal Health & Food Safety, The Belt and Road International Sci-Tech Innovation Institute of Transboundary Animal Disease Diagnosis and Immunization, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Chunyan FengChinese Academy of Quality and Inspection & Testing, Beijing, China.
Zhiliang WangChina Animal Health and Epidemiology Center, Qingdao, China.
Zhen YangKey Laboratory of Animal Diseases Diagnostic and Immunology, Ministry of Agriculture, MOE International Joint Collaborative Research Laboratory for Animal Health & Food Safety, The Belt and Road International Sci-Tech Innovation Institute of Transboundary Animal Disease Diagnosis and Immunization, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Gongguan LiuKey Laboratory of Animal Diseases Diagnostic and Immunology, Ministry of Agriculture, MOE International Joint Collaborative Research Laboratory for Animal Health & Food Safety, The Belt and Road International Sci-Tech Innovation Institute of Transboundary Animal Disease Diagnosis and Immunization, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5771-1768

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lumpy skin disease (LSD) is an emerging transboundary disease caused by lumpy skin disease virus (LSDV), posing significant threats to global cattle health in the absence of validated drugs. Here, we constructed a recombinant LSDV (rLSDV) expressing both mCherry and luciferase reporters for high-throughput drug screening, and the rLSDV retained virological characteristics phenotypically indistinguishable from the parental strain, with the reporter genes serving as precise and sensitive quantitative indicators for viral replication. Leveraging this platform, we identified six candidates from a library of anti-orthopoxvirus compounds, namely cytarabine (AraC), enrofloxacin (ENR), idoxuridine (IDU), fialuridine (FIAU), ribavirin (RBV), and vidarabine (AraA), demonstrating high antiviral activity concomitant with low cytotoxicity. Time-of-addition experiments revealed that all identified candidates primarily inhibited the viral replication phase. Mechanistical analysis revealed that anti-LSDV agents suppressed synthesis of both viral and host DNA and/or RNA. In particular, AraC markedly blocked viral DNA synthesis and prevented activation of viral late gene promoters, thereby arresting the replication cycle at an early stage. Structural alignment data suggested that AraC may bind to the viral DNA polymerase at residues D554, R639, K666, N670, and D758 to inhibit its activity. Notably, AraC induced only minimal host DNA damage and apoptosis, and host DNA synthesis gradually recovered during treatment, although these residues are conserved in bovine DNA polymerase. Hence, the mechanistic landscape delineated herein, together with the established clinical availability of the anti-orthopoxvirus agents, underscore their potential as repurposable therapeutics for LSDV infection.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseLumpy Skin DiseaseLumpy skin disease virusViral ProteinsVirus ReplicationAnimalsCattleDNA, ViralAntiviral AgentsDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA, ViralViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID41587213
PMCPMC12858068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.