Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41587087›Full record

Observational studyJMIR formative research2026

An Integrated Multilevel Mental Health Support System for University Students: 4-Year Longitudinal Observational Study.

Szilvia Vincze, Antal Bugán, Karolina Kósa, Zoltán Bács

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Szilvia VinczeChancellery, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-2130-9878
Antal BugánChancellery, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0009-0000-1052-6290
Karolina KósaChancellery, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-7867-2403
Zoltán BácsChancellery, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-0612-658X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUniversity students, in the life stage of emerging adulthood, struggle with a number of mental health problems around the world, mostly due to difficulties related to their studies and social relations. Though most students are aware of their problems, health-seeking behavior tends to lag behind. The COVID-19 pandemic aggravated mental health problems among students. In response, the University of Debrecen developed an integrated, multilevel model system aimed at the screening, prevention, and treatment of students' mental health problems.

objectiveThis paper describes the testing of the integrated, multilevel model system aimed at the screening, prevention, and treatment of students' mental health problems.

methodsThe new system consists of data collection and intervention or service functions with 2 levels of informal digital, and 3 with partly digital, partly personal service modalities. Students access the system through a dedicated smartphone app that offers other university-related functions requiring personal login. One function of the app involves a mood report with 3 categories (awful, acceptable, and good), of which one per day can be submitted by students. Based on this report, further services are offered. According to the weekly patterns of the mood report, responding students may be directed to the second level, at which screening for depression or willingness to participate in peer groups is assessed. Depending on the responses, students are referred to personal (face-to-face) services at the secondary level for intervention. Aggregated reporting for leadership on the use of functions is available at all levels, which can be used to make decisions regarding the expansion of services or creating new ones.

resultsThe model was launched in September 2020 and was tested for 45 months. After an initial increase in use, approximately 29% (8673/29,045) of all students provided mood reports (the University of Debrecen student population on October 15, 2024, was 29,045 students; the student population using the mobile app mood report was 8673 students). The percentage of students reporting a bad mood varied between 8.9% (26,465/297,372) and 12.2% (36,280/297,372) in the test period, while 50% (151,548/297,372 reports) of students reported being in a good mood. There was a marked pattern of increased use of mood reporting during the fall and spring study periods, while usage prominently decreased during the examination period and summer recess.

conclusionsThe 4-year trial period demonstrated that the mood report embedded in the mobile app can identify students with a potentially increased risk of mental health problems in need of support without stigmatization. The unique feature of our model seems to be its app-based screening at the first level and its hierarchy integrating digital and personal services. The system provides an easy-to-follow path from digital to personal services, along with time-specific data on the mental health of students for university leadership to facilitate the development of new services.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental Health ServicesStudentsAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMental HealthMobile ApplicationsUniversitiesYoung Adultappcollege studentscounsellingdigital healthdigital health serviceseHealthhealth-seekinghigher educationmental healthmHealthmobile healthmoodsmartphonestudenttelehealthundergraduateuniversityyoung adultyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID41587087
PMCPMC12887552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.