Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41587082›Full record

Trial reportJMIR formative research2026

Early Evaluation of IMAGINATOR 2.0 Intervention Targeting Self-Harm in Young People: Single-Arm Feasibility Trial.

Athina Servi, Emily Gardner-Bougaard, Saida Mohamed, Aaron McDermott, Rachel Rodrigues, Ben Aveyard, Nejra Van Zalk, Adam Hampshire, Lindsay Dewa, Martina Di Simplicio

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06311084 (IMAGINATOR 2.0), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06311084 nacompletednot on this map

IMAGINATOR 2.0: Co-design and Early Evaluation of a Novel Blended Digital Intervention Targeting Self-harm in Young People

TypeinterventionalSponsorImperial College LondonRan2022 to 2024Enrolled29ConditionsSelf Injurious Behavior, Adolescent Behavior Problem, Child Behavior Problem, Mental Health DisorderArmsImaginator 2.0
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Athina ServiDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0007-5939-1594
Emily Gardner-BougaardDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0009-2312-6689
Saida MohamedDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0003-9992-8086
Aaron McDermottDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0000-1076-7641
Rachel RodriguesDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7677-5860
Ben AveyardWest London NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2540-5330
Nejra Van ZalkDyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3504-9037
Adam HampshireInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5176-5420
Lindsay DewaSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8359-8834
Martina Di SimplicioDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5701-9659

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-harm (SH) affects around 20% of all young people in the United Kingdom. Treatment options for SH remain limited and those available are long and costly and may not suit all young people. There is an urgent need to develop new scalable interventions to address this gap. IMAGINATOR is a novel imagery-based intervention targeting SH initially developed for individuals aged 16 to 25 years. It is a blended digital intervention delivering functional imagery training via therapy sessions and a smartphone app.

objectiveThis study aimed to pilot a new version of the app, IMAGINATOR 2.0, extended to adolescents from the age of 12 years and coproduced with a diverse group of young people with lived experience. Our aim was also to test the feasibility and acceptability of delivering IMAGINATOR 2.0 in secondary mental health services.

methodsA total of 4 co-design workshops were conducted online with UK-based lived-experience co-designers aged 14-25 years to develop the IMAGINATOR 2.0 app. The intervention was then piloted with participants recruited from West London NHS Trust Tier 2 Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services and adult Mental Health Integrated Network Teams. Participants received 3 face-to-face functional imagery training sessions in which the app was introduced and 5 brief phone support sessions. Outcome assessments were conducted after completing therapy, approximately 3 months post baseline. Two focus groups gathered the therapists' perspectives on IMAGINATOR 2.0's acceptability and means of improvement. For quantitative data, descriptives are reported. Qualitative data were analyzed using a coproduced thematic analysis method with young people with lived experiences.

resultsOverall, 83 participants were referred, and 29 (gender: n=28 women, n=1 transgender; mean age 18.9, SD 3.74 years) were eligible and completed screening. Of the 27 participants who started, 59% (n=16) completed therapy per protocol, while only 15 (55.6%) completed the quantitative outcome assessment. There was an overall reduction in the number of SH episodes over 3 months from pre- to postintervention (baseline: median 7, IQR 3.5-21.5 months; postintervention: median 0, IQR 0-7 months; median difference=-6.5; r=0.69). Six themes were identified through thematic analysis of therapists' feedback, including mental imagery's potential and boundaries, therapy expectations, experience and effectiveness, accessibility of digital support, and adaptation of the IMAGINATOR 2.0 app to complement care pathways. The app was valued by therapists who highlighted the need for an intervention like IMAGINATOR 2.0 in their services.

conclusionsIMAGINATOR 2.0 shows initial promise as an acceptable brief intervention targeting SH in young people under adolescent and adult mental health services. Challenges with attrition need to be addressed for a definitive randomized controlled trial to test the intervention efficacy.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06311084; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06311084.

Indexed as

Imagery, PsychotherapyMobile ApplicationsSelf-Injurious BehaviorAdolescentAdultChildFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsUnited KingdomYoung Adultadolescentsco-productiondigitalinterventionmental imageryself-harmyoung people

Identifiers

PMID41587082
PMCPMC12887553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.