Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41587077›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Combining Noninvasive Brain Stimulation and Physiotherapy to Improve the Management of Chronic Low Back Pain in Veterans: Protocol for a Multi-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.

Frederique Dupuis, Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme, Pascale Marier Deschênes, Philippe Fournier, Ildephonse Nduwimana, Orlane Ballot, Loris Loisel, Anne Marie Pinard, Luc Lacombe, Pierre Langevin and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06999772 (Combining Non-invasive Brain Stimulation and Physiotherapy to Improve the Management of Chronic Low Back Pain in Veterans), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06999772 narecruitingnot on this map

Combining Non-invasive Brain Stimulation and Physiotherapy to Improve the Management of Chronic Low Back Pain in Veterans

TypeinterventionalSponsorLaval UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled96ConditionsChronic Low-back Pain (cLBP)ArmsActive rTMS, Sham rTMS, Psychologically-informed physiotherapy (PiP), Usual physiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Frederique DupuisCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0607-2908
Yannick Tousignant-LaflammeSchool of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1133-8707
Pascale Marier DeschênesCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5829-5620
Philippe FournierCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2423-3434
Ildephonse NduwimanaCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6961-683X
Orlane BallotCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9517-7196
Loris LoiselCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Anne Marie PinardCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7014-9359
Luc LacombeCanadian Armed Forces, Québec, QC, Canada.
Pierre LangevinCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4339-3687
Alain GaumondEspace Pleine Conscience, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0006-3879-6720
Jean-Sébastien RoyCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2853-9940
Hugo Massé-AlarieCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4472-9656

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow back pain (LBP) is the most common chronic pain condition in veterans, but the effectiveness of standard management approaches is modest. Addressing the psychological risk factors of chronic pain that are often observed in this population (eg, anxiety, depression, stress and mood disorders) may be important to enhance outcomes. Psychologically informed physiotherapy (PiP) identifies and mitigates the negative impacts of emotional and cognitive factors alongside the biomedical aspects of chronic LBP to improve physical functioning and has shown promising results in this population. However, residual pain and disability often persist in veterans. The combination of PiP with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the prefrontal cortex may enhance its effectiveness by modulating cognition, emotion, and pain perception.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to compare the effects of (1) combining active rTMS with PiP, (2) combining sham rTMS with PiP, and (3) usual physiotherapy (UP) on physical functioning in veterans with chronic LBP and comorbid psychological risk factors. Secondary objectives include comparing their effect on pain intensity, quality of life, depression symptoms, pain catastrophizing, movement pain-related fear, self-efficacy, medication use, and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms.

methodsNinety-six veterans with chronic LBP and comorbid psychological risks factors of pain will be enrolled in this 3-arm parallel randomized controlled trial. Individuals will be allocated to receive an 8-week intervention of (1) active rTMS + PiP, (2) sham rTMS + PiP, or (3) UP. Online self-administered questionnaires will be completed at baseline, 2, 8, and 26 weeks after the first treatment session. A linear mixed model will be used to assess the treatment effects by using intention-to-treat analyses. We hypothesize that active rTMS + PiP will be more effective than sham rTMS + PiP and that active PiP + rTMS or sham rTMS will be more effective than UP.

resultsEthics approval was obtained in January 2025, and participating physiotherapists completed the 2-day PiP training in May 2025. Participants have been recruited since June 2025. As of December 2025, 28 participants have been included, and recruitment is expected to continue up to June 2027, targeting the inclusion of approximately 4 new participants per month. Follow-up should be completed by December 2027, and results will be analyzed. The results of this randomized controlled trial should be published and available in June 2028.

conclusionsIt is paramount to identify innovative and effective interventions for the management of chronic LBP in veterans. This study will provide new evidence on the effectiveness of two innovative interventions targeting cognitive and emotional factors of pain (ie, PiP and rTMS). If our hypothesis is confirmed, it could motivate changes in clinical practice and improve the quality of life of veterans living with chronic LBP.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06999772; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06999772. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/78952.

Indexed as

Chronic PainLow Back PainPhysical Therapy ModalitiesTranscranial Magnetic StimulationVeteransCombined Modality TherapyHumansPain ManagementPain MeasurementQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurveys and Questionnaireschronic painlow back painmilitaryphysiotherapypsychosocialrehabilitationtranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41587077
PMCPMC12887568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.