Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41587027›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Pediatric Asthma in a Universally Insured Military Population.

Felicia Yeboah Denteh, Wendy Vaughan, Amanda Banaag, Hongyan Wu, Kimera A Joseph, Tracey Pérez Koehlmoos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Felicia Yeboah DentehCenter for Health Services Research, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
Wendy VaughanCenter for Health Services Research, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
Amanda BanaagCenter for Health Services Research, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
Hongyan WuCenter for Health Services Research, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
Kimera A JosephWalter Reed National Military Medical Center, Children's Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
Tracey Pérez KoehlmoosCenter for Health Services Research, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Pediatric asthma risk is associated with socioeconomic characteristics at individual, household, and community levels. It is critical to understand how the prevalence, treatment, and outcomes of pediatric asthma differ among ethnic and racial groups in a universally insured population. Objective: To investigate racial and ethnic differences in asthma diagnoses, potentially avoidable hospitalizations (PAHs) or emergency department (ED) visits, specialist visits, and asthma-related prescriptions among Military Health System (MHS) pediatric beneficiaries. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study investigated the prevalence of pediatric asthma among MHS beneficiaries enrolled in TRICARE Prime during fiscal year (FY) 2023. Secondary health care and pharmacy claims data were obtained from the MHS Data Repository. Participants included TRICARE Prime-enrolled dependents, aged 2 to 17 years, who were seen in at least 1 inpatient or outpatient setting during FY 2023. Exposures: Race and ethnicity, derived from sponsor demographics, was the primary variable of interest. Controlling variables included sex, sponsor marital status, number of siblings, health care setting, region, and sponsor rank. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes of interest were asthma prevalence and asthma-related outcomes (PAHs, ED visits, specialist visits, and prescriptions). Multiple logistic regressions, with 95% CIs, were used to estimate outcomes of interest within each age group and among all ages. Odds ratios (ORs) for asthma diagnosis across both age group and race and ethnicity categories were assessed among the full pediatric cohort. Results: Among the cohort of 950 896 children (largest age group, 428 212 children [45.0%] aged 11-17 years; 483 988 [50.9%] male children; 24 150 [2.5%] Asian children; 157 709 [16.6%] Black children, 166 253 [17.5%] Hispanic children, 33 032 [3.5%] Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander children, 526 324 [55.4%] White children, and 43 428 [4.6%] children of other races), 31 288 (3.3%) (18 130 boys [1.9%]) met the asthma diagnosis definition. Greater prevalence was found in older age groups, male children, and dependents with 1 or 2 siblings. Black children had the highest odds of diagnosis for all ages (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.80-1.91; P < .001). Black (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.29-1.50; P < .001), Hispanic (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.25-1.48; P < .001), and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.05-1.48; P = .01) children had higher odds of an asthma-related ED visit. PAHs were too few (587 visits) to return statistically significant results. Within the asthma cohort, 27 625 children (88.3%) had a prescription for any asthma treatment and 19 961 (63.8%) had a prescription for an inhaled corticosteroid. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study of asthma prevalence and outcomes found decreases in asthma diagnoses, asthma-related ED visits, and PAHs but increases in asthma treatment and inhaled corticosteroid prescriptions. The data highlighted how low-cost to no-cost health care may have led to better asthma outcomes among the MHS pediatric population.

Indexed as

AsthmaMilitary PersonnelAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesEmergency Room VisitsFemaleHospitalizationHumansMalePrevalenceUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41587027
PMCPMC12836133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.