ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026
Comprehensive Pediatric Health Risk Stratification Using an AI-Driven Framework in Children Aged 2 to 8 Years: Design and Validation Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- MASLD In Children - A Distinct Phenotype?Current obesity reports · 2026Review
- Correction: Comprehensive Pediatric Health Risk Stratification Using an AI-Driven Framework in Children Aged 2 to 8 Years: Design and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Ethical oversight of AI-driven paediatric trials: a proactive, risk-sensitive interim review model.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early life health risks can shape long-term morbidity trajectories, yet prevailing pediatric risk assessment paradigms are often fragmented and insufficiently capable of integrating heterogeneous data streams into actionable, individualized profiles. Objective: This study aimed to design, implement, and validate an artificial intelligence-driven framework that fuses multimodal pediatric data and leverages advanced natural language processing and ensemble learning to improve early, accurate stratification of key pediatric health risks. Methods: A retrospective dataset of over 40,000 pediatric participants aged 2-8 years was used to train and evaluate the framework. Data were split into training, validation, and test sets (70%, 15%, and 15%, respectively) with a temporally mindful partitioning strategy to approximate prospective evaluation. Baseline comparators included traditional statistical and machine learning models, and the statistical significance of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) differences was assessed using the DeLong test. Results: The proposed Bidirectional Encoder Representations From Transformers-based model achieved an AUC-ROC of 0.85 (95% CI 0.82-0.88), sensitivity of 0.78, specificity of 0.80, and F1-score of 0.75 on the test set, outperforming multiple baseline models. In an additional manual comparison evaluation, automated and expert assessments aligned with 78% accuracy (78/100), and most discrepancies arose in "equivalent" cases. Conclusions: This study provides a validated, artificial intelligence-driven, multimodal pediatric health risk stratification framework that translates heterogeneous child health data into clinically actionable risk profiles, demonstrating strong discriminative performance and meaningful agreement with expert assessment. The framework supports proactive, individualized pediatric care and offers a scalable foundation for further validation across broader populations and longitudinal follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.