ArticleActa parasitologica2026
Detection of Toxoplasma Gondii and Risk Factors in Retail Meat in Southern Mexico.
Article in Acta parasitologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundToxoplasma gondii is a major foodborne parasite of global public health relevance; however, data regarding its circulation in retail meat from tropical regions of southern Mexico remain limited. This study provides updated molecular evidence on the presence of T. gondii in meats commonly sold for human consumption and evaluates retail-level and meat-specific risk factors within a One Health framework.
methodsBetween February and July 2024, a total of 276 meat samples (pork, chicken, beef, lamb, and horse meat) were collected from butcher shops, local markets, and supermarkets in Veracruz, Mexico. DNA was extracted using Chelex-based protocols, and T. gondii detection was performed by PCR targeting the B1 gene, followed by sequencing and phylogenetic analysis. Prevalence estimates were calculated using Wilson’s score and Clopper–Pearson confidence intervals, while associations with potential risk factors were evaluated using Fisher’s exact test and Firth penalized logistic regression.
resultsT. gondii DNA was detected in 30 samples (10.9%). Pork showed the highest positivity rate (28.0%), whereas chicken (3.1%), lamb (1.4%), and horse meat (25.0%) exhibited lower detection frequencies; no beef samples tested positive. Contamination was significantly associated with the retail environment, with butcher shops (adjusted OR = 22.50) and local markets (adjusted OR = 12.55) presenting markedly higher odds of detection compared with supermarkets. Phylogenetic analysis revealed low genetic diversity, with all local isolates clustering within a single monophyletic clade.
conclusionsPork, particularly when sold in butcher shops and local markets, represents the primary source of T. gondii exposure among retail meats in tropical southern Mexico. These findings underscore the need for improved biosecurity in small-scale production systems, enhanced hygiene practices in informal retail settings, and strengthened public education on safe meat handling and cooking. Future studies incorporating parasite viability assays and expanded sampling are warranted to refine consumer risk assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41586924What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.