ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026
Selective MYC 5' amplification in postirradiation/lymphedema-associated angiosarcoma.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We assessed whether an endothelium-specific enhancer is co-amplified with MYC in postirradiation/lymphedema-associated angiosarcoma (PLAS). First, the signal pattern and diagnostic utility of MYC break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were examined to distinguish PLAS from carcinoma. Next, public data were analyzed to determine the association between the MYC-co-amplified region and cell type-specific active enhancers. Six cases of PLAS were retrieved, including three with a history of breast cancer. Additionally, we retrieved 23 MYC-amplified carcinoma cases, of which seven were breast cancers. MYC break-apart FISH was performed in all cases. The MYC-co-amplified regions in angiosarcoma and other carcinomas were explored using cBioportal. Endothelium-specific active enhancers were searched using H3K4me1 and H3K27ac chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing data on ENCODE. MYC break-apart FISH analysis revealed selective 5' amplification in all six PLAS cases, whereas 16 of 23 carcinomas, as well as six of seven MYC-amplified breast cancers, exhibited dual-signal amplification. cBioportal data analysis revealed 5' skewing of the MYC-co-amplified region in angiosarcoma, which was not readily apparent in other carcinomas. ENCODE chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing data analysis revealed endothelium-specific active enhancers upstream of MYC; the cell/tissue-type-specific 3' enhancer was not conspicuous. In conclusion, MYC break-apart FISH is a useful adjunctive tool for distinguishing PLAS from carcinoma. The 5' skewing of the MYC-co-amplified region, possibly associated with an endothelium-specific active enhancer, was confirmed. Subsequent studies involving larger case series, higher-resolution genomic experiments, and single-cell epigenetic experiments are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41586908What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.