ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Integrated CT pipeline for automatic intracranial hemorrhage evaluation with GPT-enhanced clinical decision support.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesIntracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a time-critical neurological emergency in which rapid CT-based assessment directly informs treatment decisions. This study aimed to develop an automated deep-learning pipeline to enhance ICH detection, segmentation, and localization, complemented by clinical decision-making support through a large language model. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe detection model was trained on 21,784 labeled and 3528 unlabeled CT scans from the RSNA dataset using semi-supervised learning. The segmentation model was trained on 1226 scans from the HS dataset to delineate six ICH subtypes. Hydrocephalus and midline-shift models were trained on a dedicated 507-scan subset of the HS dataset. Hemorrhage and edema locations were registered to standard brain regions to improve interpretability. For evaluation, the CQ500 dataset (491 patients) was used as an external validation and test cohort. Clinical recommendations were generated using the GPT-4o Assistants API based on published guidelines and trials.
resultsOn the test set, detection achieved an AUC of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.98), and segmentation yielded Dice values ranging from 0.71 to 0.93 with corresponding 95% CIs from 0.61-0.76 to 0.90-0.96, while volume estimation showed high concordance (CCC 0.820-0.996). Intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH) localization demonstrated strong agreement with κ values of 0.85-1.00 across brain regions. Clinical decisions generated by the pipeline were highly rated, with one neurosurgeon assigning median scores of 4 and 5 for examination and treatment, and the other assigning 5 for both.
conclusionsThis deep learning pipeline combines imaging analysis with actionable clinical decisions, demonstrating significant potential as a valuable tool for emergency care. KEY POINTS: Question Rapid and accurate identification of ICH on CT is critical for guiding treatment, yet remains difficult using standard emergency radiological evaluation. Findings The end-to-end artificial intelligence pipeline achieved high accuracy in ICH detection, segmentation, and localization, with strong concordance to manual measurements and reliable clinical recommendations. Clinical relevance By automating image analysis and clinical decision-making, the pipeline demonstrated significant potential to reduce diagnostic delays, improve treatment guidance, and enhance patient outcomes in emergency care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41586845What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.