ArticleSoft matter2026
How human-derived brain organoids are built differently from brain organoids derived from genetically-close relatives: a multi-scale hypothesis.
Article in Soft matter, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced extracellular matrix remodeling due to embedded spheroid fluidization.New journal of physics · 2025Article
- Altered extracellular matrix structure and elevated stiffness in a brain organoid model for disease.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Reorganizing chromatin by cellular deformation.Current opinion in cell biology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How genes influence tissue-scale organization remains a longstanding biological puzzle. While experimental efforts quantify gene expression, chromatin, cellular, and tissue structure, computational models lag behind. To help accelerate multiscale modeling, we demonstrate how a tissue-scale, cellular-based model can be merged with a cell nuclear model incorporating a deformable lamina shell and chromatin to test hypotheses linking chromatin and tissue scales. Specifically, we propose a hypothesis to explain structural differences between human, chimpanzee, and gorilla-derived brain organoids. Recent experiments reveal that a cell fate transition from neuroepithelial to radial glial cells includes a new intermediate state that is delayed in human-derived organoids, leading to significantly narrowed and lengthened apical cells. Additional experiments also demonstrated that ZEB2, a transcription factor, plays a major role in the onset of the novel intermediate state. We hypothesize that this delay stems from chromatin reorganization triggered by mechanical strain as the respective brain organoids develop, with a higher critical threshold in human-derived cells. Here, we computationally test the feasibility of such a hypothesis by exploring how slightly different initial configurations of chromatin, as modeled by different numbers of chromatin crosslinkers, organize in response to mechanical strain with increasingly different initial configurations representing less genetically-close relatives. We find that even small differences in the number of chromatin crosslinkers (>0.01%) yield distinguishable chromatin displacement on average beyond 35% mechanical strain. At higher strains, we observe a new type of nonlinear chromatin scaling law with an exponent of 3.24(5). Finally, we show how differences in chromatin strain maps and more conventional contact maps can reveal structural distinctions between genetically-close species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.