ArticleAnalytical chemistry2026
Evaluating Batch Correction Methods for Large-Scale Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Heterogeneous Tissues.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational Mass Spectrometry Imaging in the Era of AI.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Statistical Principles Define an Open-Source Differential Analysis Workflow for Mass Spectrometry Imaging Experiments with Complex Designs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In mass spectrometry imaging (MSI), the fluctuation in detected ion intensities, which is associated with "technical factors" and not the variability of molecular composition of the sample itself, may be referred to as "batch effects". These batch effects are a major barrier to the more widespread uptake and use of MSI for larger clinical and preclinical studies. In other fields, such as metabolomics and transcriptomics, batch correction methods have been introduced and commonly adopted. These methods aim to mitigate systematic biases introduced by differences in experimental conditions, instruments, or processing batches in high-dimensional data, such as omics or imaging data sets. Mass spectrometry imaging poses additional challenges compared to these fields such as the need to ensure that expected intensity fluctuations throughout a sample, associated with expected spatial variability, are maintained and the inability to randomly introduce quality control spectra. To date, there is no widely adopted approach to the batch correction of mass spectrometry imaging data. In this work, we consider both stabilization of intensity variability and the usefulness of correction methods for spatially resolved data. We present a pixel-by-pixel evaluation of batch correction for mass spectrometry imaging data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.