ReviewACS nano2026
Spectral Fingerprinting of Engineered Nanomaterials for Precision Biosensing.
Review in ACS nano, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Potential of Silver Nanoparticles in Imaging Diagnostics and Image-Guided Applications: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Modeling an SPR Sensor for Carcinoma-Related Refractive-Index Detection: The Case of CaFBiosensors · 2026Article
- Handle-free attachment of small molecules on single-walled carbon nanotubes.Nature synthesis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biological systems comprise a complex milieu of macromolecules, small molecules, and ions comprising tens of thousands of distinct species. Various clinical conditions alter the identities and concentrations of these species in a spatiotemporal-dependent manner. While bioanalytical methods such as omics or biochemical assays can precisely identify the targeted biomolecules over space and time, providing in-depth information on biological processes, they are generally considered low-throughput and costly. Spectral fingerprinting of engineered nanomaterials (SFEN) has emerged as an alternative method that addresses many of these limitations in the field of disease detection and chemical biology research. This approach leverages one or more closely related types of engineered nanomaterials to detect subtle biological differences via optical readout such as near-infrared fluorescence or surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Variations of the technique have been developed to detect single or multiplexed target biomarkers as well as whole-cell- and organism-level biological states. In recent years, the incorporation of advanced analytical methods, such as feature extraction and machine learning, has significantly expanded the SFEN capabilities for broader applications with high accuracy. This perspective highlights recent developments of SFEN applications including but not limited to machine-learning-assisted live-cell phenotyping, serum-based cancer detection, and pathogen identification. We further comment on the future directions of this promising technology, which we envision will synergize with next-generation nano-omics and generative AI methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.