Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41586703›Full record

ArticleThe MAK collection for occupational health and safety2025

Trichlorobenzene (all isomers): MAK Value Documentation, addendum - Translation of the German version from 2022.

Andrea Hartwig, MAK Commissionhttps://www.dfg.de/en/about-us/statutory-bodies/senate/health-hazards/list

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The MAK collection for occupational health and safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrea HartwigInstitute of Applied Biosciences. Department of Food Chemistry and Toxicology. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) Adenauerring 20a, Building 50.41 76131 Karlsruhe Germany.
MAK Commissionhttps://www.dfg.de/en/about-us/statutory-bodies/senate/health-hazards/list

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The German Senate Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area (MAK Commission) has re-evaluated the occupational exposure limit value (maximum concentration at the workplace, MAK value) of trichlorobenzene isomers (1,2,3-trichlorobenzene [87-61-6], 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene [120-82-1] and 1,3,5-trichlorobenzene [108-70-3]) considering all toxicological end points. Relevant studies were identified from a literature search and also unpublished study reports were used. The critical effects of the trichlorobenzenes are adverse effects on the livers of mice and rats and on the kidneys of rats. These effects were more pronounced after exposure to 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene with the rat being the most sensitive species. However, as the isomers all have a similar primary toxicological mode of action and follow similar metabolic pathways, they have been evaluated together. After exposure to 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene, liver toxicity was manifest in rats and mice as increased liver weights and histological changes in the liver were preceded by an induction of metabolic enzymes. The most sensitive end point, a disruption of porphyrin biosynthesis, was observed in a 90-day inhalation study in rats with a NOAEC of 3 ml/m

Indexed as

1,2,3-trichlorobenzene1,2,4-trichlorobenzene1,3,5-trichlorobenzenecarcinogenicityMAK valuemaximum workplace concentrationmetabolismmutagenicityporphyrinuriatoxicity

Identifiers

PMID41586703
PMCPMC12462665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.