ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2026
A Capabilities, Opportunities, and Motivations behavioral analysis of healthcare professionals concerning dengue vaccination in selected countries from Latin America and Asia Pacific.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dengue vaccination Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among healthcare providers in selected countries from Latin America and Asia Pacific.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The success of dengue vaccination programs is heavily reliant on endorsement from healthcare professionals (HCPs). This survey of 815 HCPs from Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand aimed to identify factors associated with HCPs' willingness to recommend dengue vaccination to patients. Survey responses were mapped to six subthemes within a Capabilities, Opportunities, and Motivations behavioral framework; composite scores were calculated and correlated with willingness to recommend the dengue vaccine. Psychological Capability, Reflective Motivation, and Automatic Motivation emerged as urgent priorities based on moderate correlation with willingness to recommend the vaccine (correlation coefficients 0.50, 0.56, and 0.45, respectively) and moderate scores (57‒58%). Physical Capability was categorized as a critical strength, while Physical and Social Opportunities were lesser priorities. Targeted interventions - including HCP education, risk communication, and peer-led advocacy - are likely to improve recommendation behaviors. Addressing both individual and external drivers is essential for enabling HCPs to recommend dengue vaccination effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.