Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2026
Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam dosing regimen justification using exposure-efficacy analyses in participants with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia in the RESTORE-IMI 2 phase 3 study.
Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02493764 (A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator-Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator-Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam (MK-7655A) Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Subjects With Hospital-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia or Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An exposure-efficacy analysis of the phase 3 RESTORE-IMI 2 study (NCT02493764) evaluated the relationship between plasma exposure of imipenem and relebactam and key efficacy endpoints (primary: 28-day all-cause mortality [ACM]; secondary: clinical response at early follow-up [EFU; 7-14 days after the end of treatment]) in adult participants with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) who received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam 500/500/250 mg (IMI/REL). Participants from the IMI/REL treatment group in the microbiological-modified intent-to-treat population who had pharmacokinetic (PK) data and relevant baseline pathogen susceptibility data available were included (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.