ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology2026
Associating protein residues in the literature with structural data.
Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- PDBe-SIFTS: an open-source tool for Structure Integration with Function, Taxonomy, and Sequences, featuring improved alignment, scoring scheme, and accelerated search.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein structures are crucial in understanding the function, mechanism and disease-causing variants of proteins within any living cell. A number of experimental techniques are employed by researchers to determine such structures. Through structure inspection in molecular viewers, combined with supporting biochemical and biophysical experiments, scientists are able to identify the function of a protein, its reaction mechanism and effects caused by sequence variation. These detailed findings, supported by experimental results, are documented by being described in the scientific literature and by making the accompanying data open source. However, it has become increasingly difficult for a reader, in particular a non-expert, to access the correct additional information and assess the validity of the conclusions drawn based on experimental results. A reader is often required to resort to a number of different software packages to access the different data types. Here, we present a first-of-its-kind implementation of an artificial intelligence- and text-mining-supported software tool that allows the association of mentions in the text of one or more specific protein residues with their corresponding counterparts in the respective protein structure or structures. Our application allows a researcher to explore a residue of interest in the context of a publication and its respective protein structure, supported by its experimental evidence, in a single view. We describe model implementation, annotation extraction, downstream processing, dissemination and visualization at the IUCr and PDBe. The application presented is primarily aimed at readers of IUCr publications and users visiting the PDBe entry pages. However, we believe that in the future our application will be a valuable tool for reviewers of new submissions to IUCr journals and may even be useful as a curation tool involving the authors of a publication as annotation validators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.