ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2025
Acute blood biomarker responses to consensual sexual choking/strangulation in young adult women: a randomized crossover study.
Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sexual strangulation, commonly referred to as "choking", has become increasingly common among young adults, yet its neurobiological consequences remain poorly understood. Preclinical and clinical evidence suggests strangulation may trigger axonal injury, neuroinflammation, and blood-brain barrier dysfunction. Blood biomarkers of neural injury and inflammation provide a sensitive means to detect subtle effects. Aim: To examine whether consensual sexual choking/strangulation acutely alters blood biomarkers of neural injury and inflammation compared to non-choking sexual activity in young adult women. Methods: In a randomized crossover study, 29 women (mean age 21.5 ± 2.7) completed three laboratory visits: baseline (≥24 h abstinence), post-choking sex, and post-non-choking sex. Blood was collected within 24 h of sexual events. Neural injury biomarkers (NfL, tau, GFAP, UCH-L1, S100B) and inflammatory markers (IL-1ra, TNF-R1, CCL-2, VEGF-A, VCAM-1) were analyzed using Quanterix and Luminex multiplex immunoassays. Mixed-effects regression models tested exposure-by-time interactions, adjusting for age and brain trauma history. Results: Neurofilament light (NfL) significantly increased after choking-involved sex but remained unchanged after non-choking, which resulted in a statistically significant exposure-by-time interaction [ Discussion: Consensual sexual strangulation elicited acute increases in NfL and CCL-2, with VEGF-A showing a similar pattern, suggesting transient axonal stress and hypoxia-related inflammatory signaling. These findings indicate that sexual choking/strangulation, even in consensual contexts, may have subtle, yet detectable cellular burden. Future studies with larger samples, refined temporal sampling, and multimodal outcomes are needed to clarify short- and long-term implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.