Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41586410›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2026

COVID-19 pandemic and healthcare utilization in ovarian cancer patients.

Amrita Mukherjee, Natalie Ayoub, Lanfang Xu, Kimberly L Cannavale, Elizabeth A Szamreta, Matthew J Monberg, Melissa Hodeib, Chun R Chao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amrita MukherjeeKaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S. Los Robles Ave. Pasadena, CA 91101, USA.
Natalie AyoubAdventist Health White Memorial Medical Center, 1720 E Cesar E Chavez Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Lanfang XuMedHealth Analytics Inc., 4207 Austin Meadow Dr., Sugar Land, TX 77479, USA.
Kimberly L CannavaleKaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S. Los Robles Ave. Pasadena, CA 91101, USA.
Elizabeth A SzamretaMerck & Co., Inc., 126 East Lincoln Avenue, Rahway, NJ 07065, USA.
Matthew J MonbergMerck & Co., Inc., 126 East Lincoln Avenue, Rahway, NJ 07065, USA.
Melissa HodeibKaiser Permanente Southern California, 10800 Magnolia Ave, Riverside, CA 92505, USA.
Chun R ChaoKaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S. Los Robles Ave. Pasadena, CA 91101, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare utilization and short-term safety outcomes in ovarian cancer patients. Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: Epithelial ovarian cancer patients (n = 799) diagnosed between 01/01/2017-06/30/2021 at Kaiser Permanente Southern California were included. Pre-pandemic and pandemic periods were defined using 03/04/2020 (implementation of stay-at-home order in California) as the cut-off. Care utilization outcomes included the number of office and virtual visits per person-month, number of CA125, complete blood count, electrolytes, and creatinine tests done for chemotherapy monitoring. Short-term safety outcomes included the number of emergency room (ER) visits and hospitalizations per person-month. Negative binomial models were used to evaluate associations. Results: Overall, 72.7 % and 27.3 % of the patients were diagnosed during the pre-pandemic and pandemic period, respectively. Mean (S.D.) number of office visits per person-month decreased during the pandemic period [0.4 (0.5) vs 0.6 (0.6) in pre-pandemic, p-value < 0.01]. Mean number of virtual visits increased during the pandemic [0.4 (0.7) vs 0.2 (0.3) in pre-pandemic, p-value < 0.01]. The number of virtual visits was twice during the pandemic vs the pre-pandemic period [adjusted-rate ratio (95 %CI): 2.04 (1.54-2.72)]. No differences in ER visits were observed by pandemic periods. Hospitalization rate was lower during the pandemic [adjusted-RR (95 %CI): 0.85 (0.72-1.00)]. In patients who received chemotherapy (n = 684), no differences in chemotherapy monitoring were observed. Conclusions: Despite a shift from office visits to virtual visits during COVID-19, no differences in laboratory monitoring of chemotherapy and no increase in ER visits and hospitalizations were observed in ovarian cancer patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemicHealthcare utilizationHospitalizationOvarian cancerVirtual visits

Identifiers

PMID41586410
PMCPMC12830075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.