ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2026
Magnetocardiography for noninvasive surveillance of rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant recipients.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Letter to the Editor about the article:American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart transplantation is the definitive treatment for end-stage heart failure, yet long-term graft survival is hindered by two major complications: acute/chronic rejection (cellular or antibody mediated) and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Standard surveillance is performed to screen for these issues and predominantly consists of cardiac catheterization with hemodynamics, endomyocardial biopsy and invasive coronary angiography, with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and coronary flow reserve. The use of IVUS increases the sensitivity for CAV detection. Overall, these procedures have associated morbidities, need anesthesia and have associated patient discomfort and substantial cost. Magnetocardiography (MCG), a noninvasive modality that measures cardiac magnetic fields, has emerged as a potential tool for early detection of complications in post-transplant patients. Unlike electrocardiography, MCG provides spatially resolved data on depolarization and repolarization, independent of body habitus or tissue conductivity. Early studies suggest that MCG can identify electrophysiologic abnormalities associated with both acute rejection and CAV, in some cases preceding histologic or angiographic confirmation. Rejection is reflected by alterations in magnetic dipole strength and repolarization heterogeneity, while CAV correlates with repolarization dispersion indices such as QTc heterogeneity and Magnetic Dispersion Velocity. Despite promising pilot data, MCG remains underutilized, largely due to small study sizes, lack of standardized interpretation, and limited availability of equipment. This review synthesizes the existing evidence, highlights potential advantages and limitations, and outlines future directions for integrating MCG into standard post-transplant surveillance protocols.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.