Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41586335›Full record

ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2026

Three different indications for left ventricular unloading in one patient with severe heart failure.

Thomas Gausepohl, Ulrike Flierl, Vera Garcheva, Marcel Ricklefs, Bernd Schwedhelm, Johann Bauersachs, Tobias J Pfeffer, Andreas Schäfer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thomas GausepohlDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical School Hannover, Germany.
Ulrike FlierlDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical School Hannover, Germany.
Vera GarchevaDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical School Hannover, Germany.
Marcel RicklefsDepartment of Cardiology, Klinikum Region Hannover Siloah, Germany.
Bernd SchwedhelmDepartment of Cardiology, Klinikum Region Hannover Siloah, Germany.
Johann BauersachsDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical School Hannover, Germany.
Tobias J PfefferDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical School Hannover, Germany.
Andreas SchäferDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical School Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The percutaneous microaxial flow pump (mAFP) is an established mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device for cardiogenic shock (CS) and can also stabilize hemodynamics during cardiac and noncardiac procedures. This case series describes the safety and feasibility of repeated mAFP use for three indications in a single patient. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed three consecutive mAFP deployments in one patient enrolled in the Hannover-Cardiac-Unloading-REgistry between October 2021 and August 2023. Indications included acute myocardial infarction-related CS (AMI-CS), ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation one year later, and elective thyroidectomy for amiodarone-induced hyperthyroidism another year later. Results: A 62-year-old patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy (initial LVEF 34%) achieved hemodynamic stabilisation during AMI-CS, successful protected VT ablation without compromise, and stable perioperative support during thyroidectomy. No major adverse events occurred. Conclusions: Repeated mAFP use for AMI-CS, VT ablation, and high-risk surgery was feasible and safe, supporting its versatility in complex clinical care.

Indexed as

Heart failureImpellaMechanical circulatory support

Identifiers

PMID41586335
PMCPMC12830286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.