Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41586320›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026

A novel automated framework for multi-engine Monte Carlo model commissioning in proton therapy.

Yifei Pi, Haiyang Wang, Yawei Zhang, Zhao Peng, Xianhu Zeng, Yuexin Guo, Chunbo Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yifei PiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Haiyang WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Yawei ZhangUniversity of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, United States of America.
Zhao PengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Xianhu ZengDepartment of Radiotherapy Physics & Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yuexin GuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Chunbo LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Accurate commissioning of proton beam models remained a major challenge in pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy. This study presented an automated Monte Carlo (MC) modeling framework that was designed to automate and standardize beam model commissioning. Materials and methods: This framework supported commissioning workflows by optimizing beam parameters based on user-supplied data including integrated depth dose curves, lateral profiles, measured absolute dose per energy, etc. It incorporated optimization algorithms including particle swarm optimization and Nelder-Mead, and followed a modular pipeline including data preparation, phase space parameter fitting, energy spectrum tuning, and dose calibration. Validation was performed using 20 clinical cases and over 100 measurement 2D planes in water-based patient-specific quality assurance (QA) plans. The framework was commissioned with TOol for PArticle Simulation (TOPAS) and Monte Carlo square (MCsquare). Results: After tuning, both MC engines reproduced maximum range errors of 0.3 % (TOPAS) and 0.6 % (MCsquare) at depths corresponding to 80 % and 20 % of the maximum dose, and similarly small deviations in the full width at half maximum and peak dose. For QA plans, the median gamma pass rate was 100.0 % for TOPAS under the 3 %/3 mm criterion (range: 95.3 %-100.0 %, mean: 99.9 %), with MCsquare achieved comparable results with minimum pass rates above 94.3 %. Conclusions: This open-source, Python-based framework provided a robust and extensible solution for automated multi-engine MC beam commissioning in proton therapy. It enhanced reproducibility and efficiency, facilitating both clinical and research applications in medical physics.

Indexed as

Automated frameworkModel commissioningMonte CarloProton therapy

Identifiers

PMID41586320
PMCPMC12830244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.